Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26126532›Full record

SynthesisBMC geriatrics2015

What type, or combination of exercise can improve preferred gait speed in older adults? A meta-analysis.

Renske Van Abbema, Mathieu De Greef, Celine Crajé, Wim Krijnen, Hans Hobbelen, Cees Van Der Schans

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC geriatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 55 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03390478 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

MIND&GAIT - Promoting Independent Living in Frail Older Adults by Improving Cognition and Gait Ability and Using Assistive Products

TypeinterventionalSponsorEscola Superior de Enfermagem de CoimbraRan2018 to 2018Enrolled62ConditionsFrailty, Cognition, Mild Cognitive ImpairmentArmsCombined Intervention Group
NCT05627453 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Helping Older People Recover Walking Abilities Through Arm-in-armg Gait Training: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPhilippe TerrierRan2022 to 2026Enrolled132ConditionsHealthy AgingArmsArm-in-arm gait training, Normal gait training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. The 2017 Dutch Physical Activity Guidelines.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2018
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Association Between Improved Mobility and Distal Health Outcomes.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2020
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Association of Physical Activity and Gait Speed: Does Context Matter?American journal of lifestyle medicine · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Renske Van AbbemaResearch group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing - Hanze University Groningen, University of Applied Sciences, PO Box 3109, 9701, DC, Groningen, The Netherlands. r.van.abbema@pl.hanze.nl.
Mathieu De GreefResearch group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing - Hanze University Groningen, University of Applied Sciences, PO Box 3109, 9701, DC, Groningen, The Netherlands. m.h.g.de.greef@pl.hanze.nl.
Celine CrajéResearch group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing - Hanze University Groningen, University of Applied Sciences, PO Box 3109, 9701, DC, Groningen, The Netherlands. c.craje@pl.hanze.nl.
Wim KrijnenResearch group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing - Hanze University Groningen, University of Applied Sciences, PO Box 3109, 9701, DC, Groningen, The Netherlands. w.p.krijnen@pl.hanze.nl.
Hans HobbelenResearch group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing - Hanze University Groningen, University of Applied Sciences, PO Box 3109, 9701, DC, Groningen, The Netherlands. j.s.m.hobbelen@pl.hanze.nl.
Cees Van Der SchansResearch group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing - Hanze University Groningen, University of Applied Sciences, PO Box 3109, 9701, DC, Groningen, The Netherlands. c.p.van.der.schans@pl.hanze.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproved preferred gait speed in older adults is associated with increased survival rates. There are inconsistent findings in clinical trials regarding effects of exercise on preferred gait speed, and heterogeneity in interventions in the current reviews and meta-analyses.

objectiveto determine the meta-effects of different types or combinations of exercise interventions from randomized controlled trials on improvement in preferred gait speed.

methodsDATA SOURCES: A literature search was performed; the following databases were searched for studies from 1990 up to 9 December 2013: PubMed, EMBASE, EBSCO (AMED, CINAHL, ERIC, Medline, PsycInfo, and SocINDEX), and the Cochrane Library. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials of exercise interventions for older adults ≥ 65 years, that provided quantitative data (mean/SD) on preferred gait speed at baseline and post-intervention, as a primary or secondary outcome measure in the published article were included. Studies were excluded when the PEDro score was ≤4, or if participants were selected for a specific neurological or neurodegenerative disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, cardiovascular disease, recent lower limb fractures, lower limb joint replacements, or severe cognitive impairments. The meta-effect is presented in Forest plots with 95 % confidence STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS

methodsintervals and random weights assigned to each trial. Homogeneity and risk of publication bias were assessed.

resultsTwenty-five studies were analysed in this meta-analysis. Data from six types or combinations of exercise interventions were pooled into sub-analyses. First, there is a significant positive meta-effect of resistance training progressed to 70-80 % of 1RM on preferred gait speed of 0.13 [CI 95 % 0.09-0.16] m/s. The difference between intervention- and control groups shows a substantial meaningful change (>0.1 m/s). Secondly, a significant positive meta-effect of interventions with a rhythmic component on preferred gait speed of 0.07 [CI 95 % 0.03-0.10] m/s was found. Thirdly, there is a small significant positive meta-effect of progressive resistance training, combined with balance-, and endurance training of 0.05 [CI 95 % 0.00-0.09] m/s. The other sub-analyses show non-significant small positive meta-affects.

conclusionsProgressive resistance training with high intensities, is the most effective exercise modality for improving preferred gait speed. Sufficient muscle strength seems an important condition for improving preferred gait speed. The addition of balance-, and/or endurance training does not contribute to the significant positive effects of progressive resistance training. A promising component is exercise with a rhythmic component. Keeping time to music or rhythm possibly trains higher cognitive functions that are important for gait. LIMITATIONS: The focus of the present meta-analysis was at avoiding as much heterogeneity in exercise interventions. However heterogeneity in the research populations could not be completely avoided, there are probably differences in health status within different studies.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overExerciseExercise TherapyFemaleFractures, BoneGaitHumansMaleMuscle StrengthRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResistance Training

Identifiers

PMID26126532
PMCPMC4488060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.