Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26126267›Full record

ArticleeLife2015

The global distribution of the arbovirus vectors Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus.

Moritz U G Kraemer, Marianne E Sinka, Kirsten A Duda, Adrian Q N Mylne, Freya M Shearer, Christopher M Barker, Chester G Moore, Roberta G Carvalho, Giovanini E Coelho, Wim Van Bortel and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,083 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,083citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,083 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Post-establishment environmental suitability ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

1,023 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Moritz U G KraemerSpatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Marianne E SinkaSpatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Kirsten A DudaSpatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Adrian Q N MylneWellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Freya M ShearerWellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Christopher M BarkerDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7941-346X
Chester G MooreDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, United States.
Roberta G CarvalhoNational Dengue Control Program, Ministry of Health, Brasilia, Brazil.
Giovanini E CoelhoNational Dengue Control Program, Ministry of Health, Brasilia, Brazil.
Wim Van BortelEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden.
Guy HendrickxAvia-GIS, Zoersel, Belgium.
Francis SchaffnerAvia-GIS, Zoersel, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9166-7617
Iqbal R F ElyazarEijkman-Oxford Clinical Research Unit, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Hwa-Jen TengCenter for Research, Diagnostics and Vaccine Development, Centers for Disease Control, Taipei, Taiwan.
Oliver J BradyWellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jane P MessinaSpatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
David M PigottSpatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6731-4034
Thomas W ScottFogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States.
David L SmithSpatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4367-3849
G R William WintEnvironmental Research Group Oxford, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Nick GoldingWellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8916-5570
Simon I HayWellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0611-7272

Funding

Surveillance Core (B)P01AI098670 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI SCOTT, THOMAS WALLACE · 2014 to 2018
$7.9M
SYTEMS AND INTEGRATIVE BIOLOGYT32GM008322 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LOW, MALCOLM JAMES · 1990 to 2020
$5.7M
Measuring Entomological Risk for DengueR01AI069341 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI SCOTT, THOMAS WALLACE · 2006 to 2010
$2.3M
Improving Robustness of a Tactical Model of Aedes/Dengue DynamicsR01AI091980 · NIAID · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI GOULD, FRED · 2011 to 2014
$1.3M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilNIAID NIH HHS 1P01AI098670NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI098670NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI069341NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI069341NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI091980NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI091980NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM08322NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008322PHS HHS N01-A1-25489Wellcome Trust 089276Wellcome Trust 095066Wellcome Trust 099872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dengue and chikungunya are increasing global public health concerns due to their rapid geographical spread and increasing disease burden. Knowledge of the contemporary distribution of their shared vectors, Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus remains incomplete and is complicated by an ongoing range expansion fuelled by increased global trade and travel. Mapping the global distribution of these vectors and the geographical determinants of their ranges is essential for public health planning. Here we compile the largest contemporary database for both species and pair it with relevant environmental variables predicting their global distribution. We show Aedes distributions to be the widest ever recorded; now extensive in all continents, including North America and Europe. These maps will help define the spatial limits of current autochthonous transmission of dengue and chikungunya viruses. It is only with this kind of rigorous entomological baseline that we can hope to project future health impacts of these viruses.

Indexed as

Insect VectorsPhylogeographyAedesAnimalsArbovirus InfectionsGlobal HealthHumansAe. aegyptiAe. albopictusAedesecologyepidemiologyglobal health

Identifiers

PMID26126267
PMCPMC4493616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.