Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26126082›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in virology2015

Animal models for influenza virus transmission studies: a historical perspective.

Nicole M Bouvier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in virology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Animal Models in Influenza Research.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Secondary infection withFEMS microbes · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicole M BouvierDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029 USA; Department of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029 USA. Electronic address: nicole.bouvier@mssm.edu.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

Quantifying Environmental Variables Affecting Airborne Influenza TransmissionR01AI110703 · NIAID · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI BOUVIER, NICOLE M. · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201400008CNIAID NIH HHS R01 AI110703NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI110703-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal models are used to simulate, under experimental conditions, the complex interactions among host, virus, and environment that affect the person-to-person spread of influenza viruses. The three species that have been most frequently employed, both past and present, as influenza virus transmission models-ferrets, mice, and guinea pigs-have each provided unique insights into the factors governing the efficiency with which these viruses pass from an infected host to a susceptible one. This review will highlight a few of these noteworthy discoveries, with a particular focus on the historical contexts in which each model was developed and the advantages and disadvantages of each species with regard to the study of influenza virus transmission among mammals.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsFerretsGuinea PigsHumansInfluenza A virusInfluenza, HumanMice

Identifiers

PMID26126082
PMCPMC4550509
OpenAlexW777202150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.