Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26125681›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2016

Stone-dwelling actinobacteria Blastococcus saxobsidens, Modestobacter marinus and Geodermatophilus obscurus proteogenomes.

Haïtham Sghaier, Karima Hezbri, Faten Ghodhbane-Gtari, Petar Pujic, Arnab Sen, Daniele Daffonchio, Abdellatif Boudabous, Louis S Tisa, Hans-Peter Klenk, Jean Armengaud and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genotype-phenotype correlations within theFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Draft Genome Sequences ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Properties ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Haïtham SghaierNational Center for Nuclear Sciences and Technology, Sidi Thabet Technopark, Ariana, Tunisia.
Karima HezbriLaboratoire Microorganismes et Biomolécules Actives, Université de Tunis Elmanar (FST) and Université de Carthage (INSAT), Tunis, Tunisia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8693-2316
Faten Ghodhbane-GtariLaboratoire Microorganismes et Biomolécules Actives, Université de Tunis Elmanar (FST) and Université de Carthage (INSAT), Tunis, Tunisia.
Petar PujicUniversité Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, CNRS, Ecologie Microbienne, UMR 5557, Villeurbannes, France.
Arnab SenNBU Bioinformatics Facility, Department of Botany, University of North Bengal, Siliguri, India.
Daniele DaffonchioBESE, Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0947-925X
Abdellatif BoudabousLaboratoire Microorganismes et Biomolécules Actives, Université de Tunis Elmanar (FST) and Université de Carthage (INSAT), Tunis, Tunisia.
Louis S TisaDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA.
Hans-Peter KlenkSchool of Biology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Jean ArmengaudCEA, DSV, IBITEC-S, Lab Innovative Technologies for Detection and Diagnostic, Bagnols-sur-Cèze, France.
Philippe NormandUniversité Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, CNRS, Ecologie Microbienne, UMR 5557, Villeurbannes, France.
Maher GtariLaboratoire Microorganismes et Biomolécules Actives, Université de Tunis Elmanar (FST) and Université de Carthage (INSAT), Tunis, Tunisia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6946-6907

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Geodermatophilaceae are unique model systems to study the ability to thrive on or within stones and their proteogenomes (referring to the whole protein arsenal encoded by the genome) could provide important insight into their adaptation mechanisms. Here we report the detailed comparative genome analysis of Blastococcus saxobsidens (Bs), Modestobacter marinus (Mm) and Geodermatophilus obscurus (Go) isolated respectively from the interior and the surface of calcarenite stones and from desert sandy soils. The genome-scale analysis of Bs, Mm and Go illustrates how adaptation to these niches can be achieved through various strategies including 'molecular tinkering/opportunism' as shown by the high proportion of lost, duplicated or horizontally transferred genes and ORFans. Using high-throughput discovery proteomics, the three proteomes under unstressed conditions were analyzed, highlighting the most abundant biomarkers and the main protein factors. Proteomic data corroborated previously demonstrated stone-related ecological distribution. For instance, these data showed starvation-inducible, biofilm-related and DNA-protection proteins as signatures of the microbes associated with the interior, surface and outside of stones, respectively.

Indexed as

ActinobacteriaActinomycetalesAdaptation, PhysiologicalBiodiversityChromatography, LiquidGeologic SedimentsMass SpectrometryProteomics

Identifiers

PMID26125681
PMCPMC4681853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.