Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26125623›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2015

A Structural and Functional Comparison Between Infectious and Non-Infectious Autocatalytic Recombinant PrP Conformers.

Geoffrey P Noble, Daphne W Wang, Daniel J Walsh, Justin R Barone, Michael B Miller, Koren A Nishina, Sheng Li, Surachai Supattapone

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. RNA as a component of scrapie fibrils.Scientific reports · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Cofactor molecules: Essential partners for infectious prions.Progress in molecular biology and translational science · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Geoffrey P NobleDepartments of Biochemistry and Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States of America.
Daphne W WangMedicine and Biomedical Sciences Graduate Program, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Daniel J WalshDepartments of Biochemistry and Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States of America.
Justin R BaroneDepartment of Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America.
Michael B MillerDepartments of Biochemistry and Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States of America.
Koren A NishinaDepartments of Biochemistry and Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States of America.
Sheng LiMedicine and Biomedical Sciences Graduate Program, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Surachai SupattaponeDepartments of Biochemistry and Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States of America.

Funding

Origin and Mechanism of Promiscuous Prion StrainsR01NS046478 · NINDS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI SUPATTAPONE, SURACHAI · 2004 to 2017
$5.0M
NINDS NIH HHS 2R01NS046478NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS046478
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infectious prions contain a self-propagating, misfolded conformer of the prion protein termed PrPSc. A critical prediction of the protein-only hypothesis is that autocatalytic PrPSc molecules should be infectious. However, some autocatalytic recombinant PrPSc molecules have low or undetectable levels of specific infectivity in bioassays, and the essential determinants of recombinant prion infectivity remain obscure. To identify structural and functional features specifically associated with infectivity, we compared the properties of two autocatalytic recombinant PrP conformers derived from the same original template, which differ by >105-fold in specific infectivity for wild-type mice. Structurally, hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (DXMS) studies revealed that solvent accessibility profiles of infectious and non-infectious autocatalytic recombinant PrP conformers are remarkably similar throughout their protease-resistant cores, except for two domains encompassing residues 91-115 and 144-163. Raman spectroscopy and immunoprecipitation studies confirm that these domains adopt distinct conformations within infectious versus non-infectious autocatalytic recombinant PrP conformers. Functionally, in vitro prion propagation experiments show that the non-infectious conformer is unable to seed mouse PrPC substrates containing a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor, including native PrPC. Taken together, these results indicate that having a conformation that can be specifically adopted by post-translationally modified PrPC molecules is an essential determinant of biological infectivity for recombinant prions, and suggest that this ability is associated with discrete features of PrPSc structure.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocatalysisCommunicable DiseasesDisease Models, AnimalMicePrionsProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalPrPC ProteinsPrPSc ProteinsPrionsPrPC ProteinsPrPSc Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26125623
PMCPMC4488359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.