ArticleAIDS (London, England)2015
CD4+ gain percentile curves for monitoring response to antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected adults.
Article in AIDS (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Continuous quality improvement interventions to improve long-term outcomes of antiretroviral therapy in women who initiated therapy during pregnancy or breastfeeding in the Democratic Republic of Congo: design of an open-label, parallel, group randomized trial.BMC health services research · 2017Trial
- Associations between recent thymic emigrants and CD4+ T-cell recovery after short-term antiretroviral therapy initiation.AIDS (London, England) · 2020Article
- Timing of pregnancy, postpartum risk of virologic failure and loss to follow-up among HIV-positive women.AIDS (London, England) · 2017Article
- Development of an algorithm for determination of the likelihood of virological failure in HIV-positive adults receiving antiretroviral therapy in decentralized care.Global health action · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesWe constructed CD4 cell count gain percentile distributions standardized by baseline CD4 cell count and assessed the association between poor CD4 cell count gain and subsequent death and virological failure on antiretroviral therapy (ART).
designSecondary analysis of 10 years of clinical data from a cohort of adults initiated on ART at the Themba Lethu clinic in Johannesburg, South Africa.
methodsThe generalized additive model for location, scale and shape was used to construct percentile curves for CD4 cell count gain standardized by baseline CD4 cell count in the first 28 months of ART. Cox proportional models were used to assess the association between lower percentiles (<50th) of CD4 cell count gain, and subsequent death and virological failure.
resultsAmong 9640 nonpregnant adults 7406, with available CD4 cell count results for CD4 gain calculation at 4 months of ART, 843 (8.7%) died subsequently and 1101 (11.4%) experienced virologic failure, respectively. For CD4 gains below the third percentile, the adjusted hazard ratios at different time points ranged between 2.72 and 5.73 for death, and between 1.48 and 6.93 for virologic failure. The CD4 percentile curves revealed a gradient of increasing risk of subsequent death and virological failure, with lower CD4 gain percentiles and increasing time on ART, and were more informative than the WHO criteria for immunological failure or current CD4 cell count.
conclusionPercentile curves of CD4 cell count gain provide a simple tool for healthcare workers in low-resource settings to monitor response to ART with improved information regarding risk of death and virological failure compared to current WHO criteria for immunological failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.