ArticleJournal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE2014
A New Measure of Research Participant Burden: Brief Report.
Article in Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The research burden of randomized controlled trial participation: a systematic thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence.BMC medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Research Burden in Pediatric Cancer: A Mixed Methods Study From the PediQUEST Response Trial.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Multiphase optimization strategy to establish optimal delivery of nutrition-related services in healthcare settings: A step towards clinical trial.Contemporary clinical trials · 2024Trial
- A public and patient consultation process as an aid to design a person-centred randomized clinical trial.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021Trial
- Increasing Physical Activity among Breast Cancer Survivors by Modulating Temporal Orientation with rTMS: Feasibility and Potential Efficacy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Interstitial fluid rejuvenation through young-donor plasma exchange in cognitively impaired patients: a pilot safety and feasibility study.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Feasibility of High-Intensity Interval Exercise in Young Adult Survivors of Pediatric Brain Tumor and Young Adults With Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-Mutant Gliomas (HYPE): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- PROTOCOL: Comparative Effectiveness of Tools for Communicating Health Research Results to Study Participants and Others With Relevant Lived Experience: A Living Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.Campbell systematic reviews · 2026Review
- Article
- Experiences of participant burden in an Alzheimer's disease research center longitudinal cohort.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2026Article
- Article
- Study partners' views on remuneration in longitudinal Alzheimer's disease research.Alzheimer's & dementia. Behavior & socioeconomics of aging · 2025Article
- An AI-Based Chatbot to Support Health-Related Social Needs among Pediatric Primary Care Population: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Improving Prediction of Falls and Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson Disease: Protocol for a Decentralized Observational Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Understanding parental consent and trust in paediatric LRTI research: insights from a qualitative study in Indonesia.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Recovery from disability after geriatric-home rehabilitation versus standard of care: protocol for a pilot study in older persons with disability at hospital discharge.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2025Article
- Article
- Sponsor- vs. FDA-Initiated Changes to Pediatric Clinical Trial Protocols: A Comparison of Associated Participant Burden.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Effective conceptualizations of research burden should address indirect burdens related to research duration, intensity, and invasiveness. Introducing the concept of perceived research burden, we developed, tested, and validated a new instrument, the Perceived Research Burden Assessment (PeRBA). Initial psychometric evaluation of PeRBA reveals good internal consistency, evidence of face validity, and acceptable convergent and discriminant validity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.