Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26124985›Full record

ArticleGMS hygiene and infection control2015

On the history of plasma treatment and comparison of microbiostatic efficacy of a historical high-frequency plasma device with two modern devices.

Judith Napp, Georg Daeschlein, Matthias Napp, Sebastian von Podewils, Denis Gümbel, Romy Spitzmueller, Paolo Fornaciari, Peter Hinz, Michael Jünger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GMS hygiene and infection control, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. New Wound Management of Driveline Infections with Cold Atmospheric Plasma.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022
    Article
  4. Cold Atmospheric Plasma: A Powerful Tool for Modern Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Applications of Plasma-Liquid Systems: A Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Judith NappDepartment of Dermatology, University Medicine, Greifswald, Germany.
Georg DaeschleinDepartment of Dermatology, University Medicine, Greifswald, Germany.
Matthias NappDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Medicine, Greifswald, Germany.
Sebastian von PodewilsDepartment of Dermatology, University Medicine, Greifswald, Germany.
Denis GümbelDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Medicine, Greifswald, Germany.
Romy SpitzmuellerDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Medicine, Greifswald, Germany.
Paolo FornaciariClinic of Orthopaedic Surgery, HFR Fribourg - Hôpital cantonal, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Peter HinzDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Medicine, Greifswald, Germany.
Michael JüngerDepartment of Dermatology, University Medicine, Greifswald, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAP) with its many bioactive properties has defined a new medical field: the plasma medicine. However, in the related form of high-frequency therapy, CAP was even used briefly a century ago. The aim of this study was to review historic CAP treatments and to obtain data regarding the antimicrobial efficacy of a historical high-frequency plasma device.

methodsFirst, historic literature regarding the history of CAP treatment was evaluated, because in the modern literature no data were available. Second, the susceptibility of 5 different bacterial wound isolates, cultured on agar, to a historic plasma source (violet wand [VW]) and two modern devices (atmospheric pressure plasma jet [APPJ] and Dielectric Barrier Discharge [DBD]) was analyzed . The obtained inhibition areas (IA) were compared.

resultsFirst, the most convenient popular historical electromedical treatments produced a so-called effluvia by using glass electrodes, related to today's CAP. Second, all three tested plasma sources showed complete eradication of all tested microbial strains in the treated area. The "historical" cold VW plasma showed antimicrobial effects similar to those of modern APPJ and DBD regarding the diameter of the IA.

conclusionSome retrograde evidence may be deducted from this, especially for treatment of infectious diseases with historical plasma devices. The underlying technology may serve as model for construction of modern sucessive devices.

Indexed as

antimicrobial efficacyhistoric plasma apparatuslow temperature atmospheric pressure plasmaplasma medicine

Identifiers

PMID26124985
PMCPMC4459170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.