ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2015
Dystonia: Five new things.
Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- The diagnosis of diabetic striatopathy should be made only after careful exclusion of all possible differential diagnoses.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2026Article
- Article
- Contemporary clinical neurophysiology applications in dystonia.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2021Review
- Does the Somatosensory Temporal Discrimination Threshold Change over Time in Focal Dystonia?Neural plasticity · 2017Article
- Dystonia: Five new things.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2015Article
- Recent developments in dystonia.Current opinion in neurology · 2015Review
- The Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale is Age-Dependent in Healthy Children.Movement disorders clinical practiceArticle
- A De Novo Mutation inChild neurology openArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
There has been considerable progress in our understanding of dystonia over the last century. Growing recognition of dystonia has enhanced awareness of its diverse motor phenomenology and brought attention to the importance that nonmotor features may play in this disorder, once considered to be purely motor. Using the latest technologies in human genetics, new genetic links are being discovered at an ever-quickening pace and expanding our knowledge of the disorder's complex pathogenesis. Furthermore, as we gain clearer insight into the pathophysiology of dystonia and an appreciation of the involvement of dysfunction outside the basal ganglia, dystonia has been increasingly viewed as a network disorder. Here we briefly discuss some of the recent noteworthy advances.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.