ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2015
Clinical Advantages and Limitations of Monolithic Zirconia Restorations Full Arch Implant Supported Reconstruction: Case Series.
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02931968 (A Retrospective Clinical Study Evaluating Full-Arch Monolithic Zirconia Implant Supported Fixed Dental Prosthesis), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Retrospective Clinical Study Evaluating Full-Arch Monolithic Zirconia Implant Supported Fixed Dental Prosthesis
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- High Removal Rates and Atomically Smooth Surfaces Are Achieved on Silicon Wafers Using the New SiONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Biomechanical Behavior of Different Framework and Superstructure Material Combinations in Two-Implant-Supported Four-Unit Prostheses: A Dynamic Finite Element Analysis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Titanium Base-Free Multi-Unit Abutment Connections: A Critical Review of Prosthetic Screw Design, Biomechanical Behavior, and Clinical Performance.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- All-on-4 Implant Supported Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Maxilla After Complete-Arch Guided Soft Tissue Healing: A 5-Year Follow-Up.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
- Clinical outcome and technical complications of bimaxillary full-arch implant-supported metal-resin fixed dental prostheses with or without ceramic molars: 5-year results.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- How Much is Stable the Bonding of CAD-CAM Implant-Supported All-Ceramic Restorations to Titanium Bases Clinically? A Systematic Review.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2025Review
- Marginal Bone Loss Around the Implant: A Retrospective Analysis of Bone Remodeling Over Five Years of Follow-Up.Cureus · 2024Article
- [Research progress and clinical application of veneer materials for implant-fixed restoration in edentulous jaws].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2024Review
- Mandibular biomechanics rehabilitated with different prosthetic restorations under normal and impact loading scenarios.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Impact of Prosthetic Material and Restoration Type on Peri-Implant Bone Resorption: A Retrospective Analysis in a Romanian Sample.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The Effect of Different Foundation Materials on the Color of Monolithic Zirconia at Different Thicknesses.Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran) · 2021Article
- Step-by-Step Esthetic Rehabilitation with Chairside System.Case reports in dentistry · 2021Article
- Review
- A novel digital approach for fixed full-mouth implant-supported rehabilitations: A case report.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2020Article
- Model-less digital workflow for the replication of an existing complete fixed implant-supported prosthesis using an intraoral scanner.Clinical case reports · 2019Article
- Metal stain on monolithic zirconia restoration: A case report.The journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2017Article
- Aging of monolithic zirconia dental prostheses: Protocol for a 5-year prospective clinical study using eContemporary clinical trials communications · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose. The purpose of this retrospective case series is to evaluate the clinical advantages and limitations of monolithic zirconia restorations for full arch implant supported restorations and report the rate of complications up to 2 years after insertion. Materials and Methods. Fourteen patients received implant placement for monolithic zirconia full arch reconstructions. Four implants were placed in seven arches, eleven arches received six implants, two arches received seven implants, two arches received eight implants, and one arch received nine implants. Results. No implant failures or complications were reported for an implant survival rate of 100% with follow-up ranging from 3 to 24 months. Conclusions. Monolithic zirconia CAD-/CAM-milled framework restorations are a treatment option for full arch restorations over implants, showing a 96% success rate in the present study. Some of the benefits are accuracy, reduced veneering porcelain, and minimal occlusal adjustments. The outcome of the present study showed high success in function, aesthetics, phonetics, and high patient satisfaction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.