ReviewFrontiers in plant science2015
Prunus transcription factors: breeding perspectives.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of NAC Transcription Factors in Avocado (Genes · 2026Article
- Genetic dissection of apricot fruit skin color (Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2026Article
- Monitoring Fruit Growth and Development in Apricot (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Transcriptomic analysis reveals candidate genes associated with salinity stress tolerance during the early vegetative stage in fababean genotype, Hassawi-2.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Molecular mechanisms involved in fruit cracking: A review.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Meta-QTL analysis and candidate genes identification for various abiotic stresses in maize (Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2022Article
- Effects of Auxin (Indole-3-butyric Acid) on Adventitious Root Formation in Peach-BasedPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Genome-Wide Prediction of Transcription Start Sites in Conifers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Long-read transcriptome sequencing provides insight into lignan biosynthesis during fruit development in Schisandra chinensis.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Whole transcriptome analysis resulted in the identification of Chinese sprangletop (Leptochloa chinensis) genes involved in cyhalofop-butyl tolerance.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- Tuning promoter boundaries improves regulatory motif discovery in nonmodel plants: the peach example.Plant physiology · 2021Article
- Shotgun proteomics of peach fruit reveals major metabolic pathways associated to ripening.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- Molecular Bases of Fruit Quality inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Article
- Article
- Key Maize Drought-Responsive Genes and Pathways Revealed by Comparative Transcriptome and Physiological Analyses of Contrasting Inbred Lines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Article
- Transcriptomic signature of drought response in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) and development of web-genomic resources.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Discovery of Putative Herbicide Resistance Genes and Its Regulatory Network in Chickpea Using Transcriptome Sequencing.Frontiers in plant science · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many plant processes depend on differential gene expression, which is generally controlled by complex proteins called transcription factors (TFs). In peach, 1533 TFs have been identified, accounting for about 5.5% of the 27,852 protein-coding genes. These TFs are the reference for the rest of the Prunus species. TF studies in Prunus have been performed on the gene expression analysis of different agronomic traits, including control of the flowering process, fruit quality, and biotic and abiotic stress resistance. These studies, using quantitative RT-PCR, have mainly been performed in peach, and to a lesser extent in other species, including almond, apricot, black cherry, Fuji cherry, Japanese apricot, plum, and sour and sweet cherry. Other tools have also been used in TF studies, including cDNA-AFLP, LC-ESI-MS, RNA, and DNA blotting or mapping. More recently, new tools assayed include microarray and high-throughput DNA sequencing (DNA-Seq) and RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq). New functional genomics opportunities include genome resequencing and the well-known synteny among Prunus genomes and transcriptomes. These new functional studies should be applied in breeding programs in the development of molecular markers. With the genome sequences available, some strategies that have been used in model systems (such as SNP genotyping assays and genotyping-by-sequencing) may be applicable in the functional analysis of Prunus TFs as well. In addition, the knowledge of the gene functions and position in the peach reference genome of the TFs represents an additional advantage. These facts could greatly facilitate the isolation of genes via QTL (quantitative trait loci) map-based cloning in the different Prunus species, following the association of these TFs with the identified QTLs using the peach reference genome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.