Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26124648›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2015

Older patients' perceived burdens of their health problems: a cross-sectional analysis in 74 German general practices.

Ulrike Junius-Walker, Birgitt Wiese, Renate Klaaßen-Mielke, Gudrun Theile, Christiane Annette Müller, Eva Hummers-Pradier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ulrike Junius-WalkerInstitute of General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Birgitt WieseInstitute of General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Renate Klaaßen-MielkeDepartment of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany.
Gudrun TheileInstitute of General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany ; Geriatric Clinic University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christiane Annette MüllerDepartment of General Practice/Family Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany.
Eva Hummers-PradierDepartment of General Practice/Family Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder patients often experience the burden of multiple health problems. Physicians need to consider them to arrive at a holistic treatment plan. Yet, it has not been systematically investigated as to which personal burdens ensue from certain health conditions.

objectiveThe objective of this study is to examine older patients' perceived burden of their health problems. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe study presents a cross-sectional analysis in 74 German general practices; 836 patients, 72 years and older (mean 79±4.4), rated the burden of each health problem disclosed by a comprehensive geriatric assessment. Patients rated each burden using three components: importance, emotional impact, and impact on daily activities. Cluster analyses were performed to define patterns in the rating of these components of burden. In a multilevel logistic regression analysis, independent factors that predict high and low burden were explored.

resultsPatients had a median of eleven health problems and rated the burden of altogether 8,900 health problems. Four clusters provided a good clustering structure. Two clusters describe a high burden, and a further two, a low burden. Patients attributed a high burden to social and psychological health problems (especially being a caregiver: odds ratio [OR] 10.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.4-24.4), to specific symptoms (eg, claudication: OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3-4.0; pain: OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.6-3.1), and physical disabilities. Patients rated a comparatively low burden for most of their medical findings, for cognitive impairment, and lifestyle issues (eg, hypertension: OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.2-0.3).

conclusionThe patients experienced a relatively greater burden for physical disabilities, mood, or social issues than for diseases themselves. Physicians should interpret these burdens in the individual context and consider them in their treatment planning.

Indexed as

cost of illnessgeneral practiceolder adultspatient preferencequality of life

Identifiers

PMID26124648
PMCPMC4476476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.