Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26124558›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2015

Chemosensory apparatus of Drosophila larvae.

Chandra Bose, Srijoni Basu, Nabajit Das, Sukant Khurana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Insects · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chandra BoseAuthors equally contributed.
Srijoni BasuAuthors equally contributed.
Nabajit DasIndian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata (IISER-K), Mohanpur, West Bengal - 741246, India.
Sukant KhuranaIndian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata (IISER-K), Mohanpur, West Bengal - 741246, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many insects, including Drosophila melanogaster, have a rich repertoire of olfactory behavior. Combination of robust behavioral assays, physiological and molecular tools render D. melanogaster as highly suitable system for olfactory studies. The small number of neurons in the olfactory system of fruit flies, especially the number of sensory neurons in the larval stage, makes the exploration of sensory coding at all stages of its nervous system a potentially tractable goal, which is not possible in the foreseeable future in any mammalian preparation. Advances in physiological recordings, olfactory signaling and detailed analysis of behavior, can place larvae in a position to ask previously unanswerable questions.

Indexed as

antennaantennal lobeDrosophilainsectsmushroom bodyodor-binding proteinsolfactionolfactory receptorssensilla

Identifiers

PMID26124558
PMCPMC4479052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.