Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26124557›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2015

Evolution of bacterial and fungal growth media.

Srijoni Basu, Chandra Bose, Nupur Ojha, Nabajit Das, Jagaree Das, Mrinmoy Pal, Sukant Khurana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Optimal culture conditions ofPlant biotechnology (Tokyo, Japan) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Srijoni BasuAuthors contributed equally.
Chandra BoseAuthors contributed equally.
Nupur OjhaAuthors contributed equally.
Nabajit DasAuthors contributed equally.
Jagaree DasAuthors contributed equally.
Mrinmoy PalIndian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata (IISER-K), Mohanpur, West Bengal - 741246, India.
Sukant KhuranaIndian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata (IISER-K), Mohanpur, West Bengal - 741246, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial media has undergone several changes since its inception but some key challenges remain. In recent years, there has been exploration of several alternative nutrient sources, both to cater to the specificity in requirement of growth of "fussy microorganisms" and also to reduce costs for large-scale fermentation that is required for biotechnology. Our mini-review explores these developments and also points at lacunas in the present areas of exploration, such as a lack of concerted effort in pH and osmolarity regulation. We hope that our commentary provides direction for future research in microbial media.

Identifiers

PMID26124557
PMCPMC4479053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.