Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26124175›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015

Assessment of drug-drug interactions between daclatasvir and methadone or buprenorphine-naloxone.

T Garimella, R Wang, W-L Luo, P Wastall, H Kandoussi, M DeMicco, R D Bruce, C Hwang, R Bertz, M Bifano

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. KASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatitis C.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2016
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

T GarimellaBristol-Myers Squibb Research & Development, Princeton, New Jersey, USA tushar.garimella@bms.com.
R WangBristol-Myers Squibb Research & Development, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
W-L LuoBristol-Myers Squibb Research & Development, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
P WastallBristol-Myers Squibb Research & Development, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
H KandoussiBristol-Myers Squibb Research & Development, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
M DeMiccoAnaheim Clinical Trials, Anaheim, California, USA.
R D BruceCornell Scott-Hill Health Center and Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
C HwangBristol-Myers Squibb Research & Development, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
R BertzBristol-Myers Squibb Research & Development, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
M BifanoBristol-Myers Squibb Research & Development, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USAnaheim Clinical Trials · USCornell Scott-Hill Health Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common among people who inject drugs, including those managed with maintenance opioids. Pharmacokinetic interactions between opioids and emerging oral HCV antivirals merit evaluation. Daclatasvir is a potent pangenotypic inhibitor of the HCV NS5A replication complex recently approved for HCV treatment in Europe and Japan in combination with other antivirals. The effect of steady-state daclatasvir (60 mg daily) on stable plasma exposure to oral opioids was assessed in non-HCV-infected subjects receiving methadone (40 to 120 mg; n = 14) or buprenorphine plus naloxone (8 to 24 mg plus 2 to 6 mg; n = 11). No relevant interaction was inferred if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of opioid area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (AUCτ) or maximum concentration in plasma (C max) with versus without daclatasvir was within literature-derived ranges of 0.7 to 1.43 (R- and S-methadone) or 0.5 to 2.0 (buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine). Dose-normalized AUCτ for R-methadone (GMR, 1.08; 90% CI, 0.94 to 1.24), S-methadone (1.13; 0.99 to 1.30), and buprenorphine (GMR, 1.37; 90% CI, 1.24 to 1.52) were within the no-effect range. The norbuprenorphine AUCτ was slightly elevated in the primary analysis (GMR, 1.62; 90% CI, 1.30 to 2.02) but within the no-effect range in a supplementary analysis of all evaluable subjects. Dose-normalized C max for both methadone enantiomers, buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine, were within the no-effect range. Standardized assessments of opioid pharmacodynamics were unchanged throughout daclatasvir administration with methadone or buprenorphine. Daclatasvir pharmacokinetics were similar to historical data. Coadministration of daclatasvir and opioids was generally well tolerated. In conclusion, these data suggest that daclatasvir can be administered with buprenorphine or methadone without dose adjustments.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineBuprenorphine, Naloxone Drug CombinationCarbamatesDrug InteractionsImidazolesMethadonePyrrolidinesValineBuprenorphineBuprenorphine, Naloxone Drug CombinationCarbamatesdaclatasvirImidazolesMethadonenorbuprenorphinePyrrolidinesValine

Identifiers

PMID26124175
PMCPMC4538464
OpenAlexW2129210624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.