Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26123960›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2015

Detection of Entamoeba histolytica by Recombinase Polymerase Amplification.

Gayatri Nair, Mauricio Rebolledo, A Clinton White, Zachary Crannell, R Rebecca Richards-Kortum, A Elizabeth Pinilla, Juan David Ramírez, M Consuelo López, Alejandro Castellanos-Gonzalez

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluation of Each ThreeMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prevalence of Human IntestinalPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. DNA-Detection Based Diagnostics forJournal of parasitology research · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gayatri NairDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas; Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas; Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matemáticas, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia; Departamento de Medicina Interna, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia; Departamento de Salud Pública, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Mauricio RebolledoDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas; Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas; Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matemáticas, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia; Departamento de Medicina Interna, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia; Departamento de Salud Pública, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
A Clinton WhiteDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas; Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas; Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matemáticas, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia; Departamento de Medicina Interna, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia; Departamento de Salud Pública, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Zachary CrannellDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas; Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas; Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matemáticas, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia; Departamento de Medicina Interna, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia; Departamento de Salud Pública, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
R Rebecca Richards-KortumDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas; Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas; Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matemáticas, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia; Departamento de Medicina Interna, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia; Departamento de Salud Pública, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
A Elizabeth PinillaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas; Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas; Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matemáticas, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia; Departamento de Medicina Interna, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia; Departamento de Salud Pública, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Juan David RamírezDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas; Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas; Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matemáticas, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia; Departamento de Medicina Interna, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia; Departamento de Salud Pública, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
M Consuelo LópezDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas; Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas; Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matemáticas, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia; Departamento de Medicina Interna, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia; Departamento de Salud Pública, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Alejandro Castellanos-GonzalezDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas; Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas; Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matemáticas, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia; Departamento de Medicina Interna, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia; Departamento de Salud Pública, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia alcastel@utmb.edu.
Universidad Nacional de Colombia · CO

Funding

UTMB Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001439 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI URBAN, RANDALL J · 2015 to 2024
$40.0M
UTMB Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000071 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI BRASIER, ALLAN R. · 2012 to 2014
$14.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000071NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000071NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amebiasis is an important cause of diarrheal disease worldwide and has been associated with childhood malnutrition. Traditional microscopy approaches are neither sensitive nor specific for Entamoeba histolytica. Antigen assays are more specific, but many cases are missed unless tested by molecular methods. Although polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is effective, the need for sophisticated, expensive equipment, infrastructure, and trained personnel limits its usefulness, especially in the resource-limited, endemic areas. Here, we report development of a recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) method to detect E. histolytica specifically. Using visual detection by lateral flow (LF), the test was highly sensitive and specific and could be performed without additional equipment. The availability of this inexpensive, sensitive, and field-applicable diagnostic test could facilitate rapid diagnosis and treatment of amebiasis in endemic regions.

Indexed as

Entamoeba histolyticaDNA, ProtozoanEntamoebaEntamoebiasisHumansNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRecombinasesDNA, ProtozoanRecombinases

Identifiers

PMID26123960
PMCPMC4559702
OpenAlexW2125870393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.