Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26123909›Full record

ReviewYearbook of medical informatics2015

Patient Portals as a Means of Information and Communication Technology Support to Patient- Centric Care Coordination - the Missing Evidence and the Challenges of Evaluation. A joint contribution of IMIA WG EVAL and EFMI WG EVAL.

M Rigby, A Georgiou, H Hyppönen, E Ammenwerth, N de Keizer, F Magrabi, P Scott

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Yearbook of medical informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Adult patient access to electronic health records.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Design and evaluation patient portal for patients with HTLV-1.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. User-centered design of a longitudinal care plan for children with medical complexity.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M RigbyEmeritus Professor Michael Rigby, Lavender Hill, 6 Carrighill Lower, Calverstown, Kilcullen, Co. Kildare, Ireland, Tel: +353 45 485858, E-mail: m.j.rigby@keele.ac.uk.
A Georgiou
H Hyppönen
E Ammenwerth
N de Keizer
F Magrabi
P Scott

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo review the potential contribution of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) to enable patient-centric and coordinated care, and in particular to explore the role of patient portals as a developing ICT tool, to assess the available evidence, and to describe the evaluation challenges.

methodsReviews of IMIA, EFMI, and other initiatives, together with literature reviews.

resultsWe present the progression from care coordination to care integration, and from patient-centric to person-centric approaches. We describe the different roles of ICT as an enabler of the effective presentation of information as and when needed. We focus on the patient's role as a co-producer of health as well as the focus and purpose of care. We discuss the need for changing organisational processes as well as the current mixed evidence regarding patient portals as a logical tool, and the reasons for this dichotomy, together with the evaluation principles supported by theoretical frameworks so as to yield robust evidence.

conclusionsThere is expressed commitment to coordinated care and to putting the patient in the centre. However to achieve this, new interactive patient portals will be needed to enable peer communication by all stakeholders including patients and professionals. Few portals capable of this exist to date. The evaluation of these portals as enablers of system change, rather than as simple windows into electronic records, is at an early stage and novel evaluation approaches are needed.

Indexed as

Patient-Centered CarePatient PortalsHumansPatient Care ManagementPatient Participationcare coordinationevaluationevidencePatient-centred carepatient portals

Identifiers

PMID26123909
PMCPMC4587055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.