Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26123906›Full record

SynthesisYearbook of medical informatics2015

Usability Flaws in Medication Alerting Systems: Impact on Usage and Work System.

R Marcilly, E Ammenwerth, E Roehrer, S Pelayo, F Vasseur, M-C Beuscart-Zéphir

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Yearbook of medical informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Evidence-based usability design principles for medication alerting systems.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2018
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Clinical Information Systems - From Yesterday to Tomorrow.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

R MarcillyRomaric Marcilly, CIC-IT Biocapteurs et e-santé, Innovation et usages, Maison Régionale de la Recherche Clinique, 6, rue du professeur Laguesse, 59037 LILLE, France, E-mail: romaric.marcilly@univ-lille2.fr.
E Ammenwerth
E Roehrer
S Pelayo
F Vasseur
M-C Beuscart-Zéphir

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPrevious research has shown that medication alerting systems face usability issues. There has been no previous attempt to systematically explore the consequences of usability flaws in such systems on users (i.e. usage problems) and work systems (i.e. negative outcomes). This paper aims at exploring and synthesizing the consequences of usability flaws in terms of usage problems and negative outcomes on the work system.

methodsA secondary analysis of 26 papers included in a prior systematic review of the usability flaws in medication alerting was performed. Usage problems and negative outcomes were extracted and sorted. Links between usability flaws, usage problems, and negative outcomes were also analyzed.

resultsPoor usability generates a large variety of consequences. It impacts the user from a cognitive, behavioral, emotional, and attitudinal perspective. Ultimately, usability flaws have negative consequences on the workflow, the effectiveness of the technology, the medication management process, and, more importantly, patient safety. Only few complete pathways leading from usability flaws to negative outcomes were identified.

conclusionUsability flaws in medication alerting systems impede users, and ultimately their work system, and negatively impact patient safety. Therefore, the usability dimension may act as a hidden explanatory variable that could explain, at least partly, the (absence of) intended outcomes of new technology.

Indexed as

Medical Order Entry SystemsUser-Computer InterfaceDecision Support Systems, ClinicalDrug Therapy, Computer-AssistedErgonomicsHumansMedication ErrorsPatient Safetyalerting functionsclinicaldecision support systemHuman engineeringpatient safetyreviewusabilityusage

Identifiers

PMID26123906
PMCPMC4587050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.