Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26123755›Full record

ArticleSurgery today2016

Correlation between histological invasiveness and the computed tomography value in pure ground-glass nodules.

Akihiko Kitami, Fumitoshi Sano, Shoko Hayashi, Kosuke Suzuki, Shugo Uematsu, Yoshito Kamio, Takashi Suzuki, Mitsutaka Kadokura, Mutsuko Omatsu, Toshiaki Kunimura

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery today, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A CT-based nomogram for predicting the risk of adenocarcinomas in patients with subsolid nodule according to the 2021 WHO classification.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Akihiko KitamiRespiratory Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1 Chigasaki-Chuo, Tsuzuki-ku, Yokohama-City, 224-8503, Japan. akitami@med.showa-u.ac.jp.
Fumitoshi SanoRespiratory Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1 Chigasaki-Chuo, Tsuzuki-ku, Yokohama-City, 224-8503, Japan.
Shoko HayashiRespiratory Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1 Chigasaki-Chuo, Tsuzuki-ku, Yokohama-City, 224-8503, Japan.
Kosuke SuzukiRespiratory Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1 Chigasaki-Chuo, Tsuzuki-ku, Yokohama-City, 224-8503, Japan.
Shugo UematsuRespiratory Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1 Chigasaki-Chuo, Tsuzuki-ku, Yokohama-City, 224-8503, Japan.
Yoshito KamioRespiratory Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1 Chigasaki-Chuo, Tsuzuki-ku, Yokohama-City, 224-8503, Japan.
Takashi SuzukiRespiratory Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1 Chigasaki-Chuo, Tsuzuki-ku, Yokohama-City, 224-8503, Japan.
Mitsutaka KadokuraDivision of Chest Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Mutsuko OmatsuDepartment of Clinical Diagnostic Pathology, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Toshiaki KunimuraDepartment of Clinical Diagnostic Pathology, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital · JPShowa University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between histological invasiveness and the computed tomography (CT) value and size in pure ground-glass nodules (GGNs) to determine optimal "follow-up or resection" strategies.

methodsBetween 2001 and 2014, 78 resected, pure GGNs were retrospectively evaluated. The maximum diameter and CT value of pure GGNs were measured using a computer graphics support system.

resultsAll GGNs with a maximum diameter ≤10 mm and CT value ≤-600 Hounsfield units (HU) were considered to be noninvasive lesions, while 21 of 26 (81 %) with a maximum diameter >10 mm and CT value >-600 HU were considered to be invasive lesions. With respect to the correlation between each histological type and pure GGN with a maximum diameter ≤10 mm and CT value ≤-600 HU, the specificity was 90 % and the sensitivity and negative predictive value were both 100 % in atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), while the specificity was 58 % and the sensitivity and positive predictive value were 0 % in minimally invasive and invasive adenocarcinoma.

conclusionPure GGNs with a maximum diameter of ≤10 mm and CT value of ≤-600 HU are nearly always pre-invasive lesions; therefore, surgery should be carefully selected in such patients.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLungLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedComputed tomographyDiagnosisLung cancerSurgery

Identifiers

PMID26123755
PMCPMC4819569
OpenAlexW2121237191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.