Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26123705›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2015

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Monoclonal Antibodies Approved to Treat Rheumatoid Arthritis.

David Ternant, Theodora Bejan-Angoulvant, Christophe Passot, Denis Mulleman, Gilles Paintaud

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David TernantLaboratory of Pharmacology-Toxicology, Université François-Rabelais de Tours, CNRS, GICC UMR 7292, CHRU de Tours, 2 Boulevard Tonnellé, 37044, Tours Cedex, France. david.ternant@univ-tours.fr.
Theodora Bejan-AngoulvantDepartment of Pharmacovigilance, Université François-Rabelais de Tours, CNRS, GICC UMR 7292, CHRU de Tours, Tours, France.
Christophe PassotLaboratory of Pharmacology-Toxicology, Université François-Rabelais de Tours, CNRS, GICC UMR 7292, CHRU de Tours, 2 Boulevard Tonnellé, 37044, Tours Cedex, France.
Denis MullemanDepartment of Rheumatology, Université François-Rabelais de Tours, CNRS, GICC UMR 7292, CHRU de Tours, Tours, France.
Gilles PaintaudLaboratory of Pharmacology-Toxicology, Université François-Rabelais de Tours, CNRS, GICC UMR 7292, CHRU de Tours, 2 Boulevard Tonnellé, 37044, Tours Cedex, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FRUniversité de Tours · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are increasingly used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA). At present, anti-tumor necrosis factor-α drugs (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, and golimumab), rituximab, and tocilizumab are approved for RA treatment. This review focuses on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mAbs approved in RA. Being large proteins, mAbs exhibit complex pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. In particular, owing to the interactions of mAbs with their antigenic targets, the pharmacokinetics of mAbs depends on target turnover and exhibits non-specific (linear) and target-mediated (often nonlinear) clearances. Their volume of distribution is low (3-4 L) and their elimination half-life usually ranges from 2 to 3 weeks. The inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability of mAbs is usually large and is partly explained by differences in antigenic burden or by anti-drug antibodies, which accelerate mAb elimination. The inter-individual variability of clinical response is large and influenced by the pharmacokinetics. The analysis of mAbs concentration-effect relationship relies more and more often on pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling; these models being suitable for dosing optimization. Even if adverse effects of mAbs used in RA are well known, the relationship between mAb concentration and adverse effects is poorly documented, especially for anti-tumor necrosis factor-α mAbs. Overall, RA patients treated with mAbs should benefit from individualized dosing strategies. Because of the complexity of their pharmacokinetics and mechanisms of action, the current dosing strategy of mAbs is not based on sound knowledge. New studies are needed to assess individual dosing regimen, adjusted notably to disease activity.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntirheumatic AgentsDrug ApprovalHalf-LifeHumansRheumatic FeverAntibodies, MonoclonalAntirheumatic Agents

Identifiers

PMID26123705
OpenAlexW782896843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.