Trial reportClinical drug investigation2015
Comparing Gabapentin with Clonazepam for Residual Sleeping Problems following Antidepressant Therapy in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Acceptability of Licensed and Off-Label Pharmacological Interventions for Insomnia in Patients With Severe Mental Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials.Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica · 2025Pooled it
- Residual insomnia in major depressive disorder: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Pooled it
- The Search for Consistency in Residual Symptoms in Major Depressive Disorder: A Narrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Gabapentin for the treatment of alcohol use disorder.Expert opinion on investigational drugs · 2018Review
- Functional Impairment and Changes in Depression Subtypes for Women in STAR*D: A Latent Transition Analysis.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveResidual sleeping disturbances after improvement of depression in major depressed patients are associated with more functional problems, increased relapses and more risk of becoming resistant to treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of gabapentin with clonazepam for treating residual sleeping disturbances.
methodsThis comparative trial was designed as a randomized, controlled, double-blind study. Sixty-three patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) who had been treated with one of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs; fluoxetine, citalopram or sertraline) were included in the study. The patients' depression had improved [Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) <10] but they were complaining of sleeping problems [Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) >5; Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) >8]. Patients were randomized to receive a flexible dose of gabapentin (100-600 mg/day) or clonazepam (0.5-2 mg/day) beside their current antidepressant medication for a period of 4 weeks. Outcome measures were PSQI, ISI and Clinical Global Impression (CGI).
resultsOur results demonstrated that similar to the clonazepam group, sleeping problems improved significantly in the gabapentin group at the end of the trial (PSQI: P = 0.001, Z = 3.549; ISI: P = 0.001, Z = 3.347). The two groups did not show a significant difference in treating residual sleep disturbances (PSQI: P = 0.234, Z = 1.432; ISI: P = 0.456, Z = 1.347).
conclusionThis study revealed that gabapentin is comparable to clonazepam for treating sleeping problems associated with major depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.