Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26123534›Full record

ArticleMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society2015

The Mouse Genomes Project: a repository of inbred laboratory mouse strain genomes.

David J Adams, Anthony G Doran, Jingtao Lilue, Thomas M Keane

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Impacts of ribosomal RNA sequence variation on gene expression and phenotype.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Long-read RNA sequencing reveals allele-specific NbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genetic mapping revealsScience immunology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Genome-wide screen identifies host loci that modulatebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Meiotic drive in house mice: mechanisms, consequences, and insights for human biology.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Novel spontaneous myelodysplastic syndrome mouse model.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David J AdamsWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1HH, UK. da1@sanger.ac.uk.
Anthony G DoranWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1HH, UK. ad19@sanger.ac.uk.
Jingtao LilueWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1HH, UK. jl17@sanger.ac.uk.
Thomas M KeaneWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1HH, UK. thomas.keane@sanger.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L007428/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Mouse Genomes Project was initiated in 2009 with the goal of using next-generation sequencing technologies to catalogue molecular variation in the common laboratory mouse strains, and a selected set of wild-derived inbred strains. The initial sequencing and survey of sequence variation in 17 inbred strains was completed in 2011 and included comprehensive catalogue of single nucleotide polymorphisms, short insertion/deletions, larger structural variants including their fine scale architecture and landscape of transposable element variation, and genomic sites subject to post-transcriptional alteration of RNA. From this beginning, the resource has expanded significantly to include 36 fully sequenced inbred laboratory mouse strains, a refined and updated data processing pipeline, and new variation querying and data visualisation tools which are available on the project's website ( http://www.sanger.ac.uk/resources/mouse/genomes/ ). The focus of the project is now the completion of de novo assembled chromosome sequences and strain-specific gene structures for the core strains. We discuss how the assembled chromosomes will power comparative analysis, data access tools and future directions of mouse genetics.

Indexed as

GenomeAnimalsBase SequenceDNA Transposable ElementsGenomicsMiceMice, Inbred StrainsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.