Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26123325›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2016

Safer trocar insertion for closed laparoscopic access: ex vivo assessment of an improved Veress needle.

Avinoam Nevler, Gil Har-Zahav, Danny Rosin, Mordechai Gutman

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Avinoam NevlerDepartment of General Surgery and Transplantation, Chaim Sheba Medical Center (Affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel), Tel-Hashomer, Israel. dr.nevy@gmail.com.
Gil Har-ZahavDepartment of General Surgery and Transplantation, Chaim Sheba Medical Center (Affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel), Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
Danny RosinDepartment of General Surgery and Transplantation, Chaim Sheba Medical Center (Affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel), Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
Mordechai GutmanDepartment of General Surgery and Transplantation, Chaim Sheba Medical Center (Affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel), Tel-Hashomer, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLaparoscopic surgery is widely practiced surgical technique in the modern surgical toolbox. The Veress needle insertion technique, while faster and easier, is associated with higher rates of iatrogenic complications (injury to internal organs, major blood vessels, etc.), morbidity and even mortality with a reported overall risk of 0.32% during surgical interventions. In order to increase the safety and ease of closed insertion technique, we designed and tested an improved prototype of the Veress needle.

methodsThe new Veress needle includes a distal expandable portion that allows elevation of the abdominal wall and safe insertion of the first trocar over it. The needle was assessed by measurement of ease of insertion, ease of trocar advancement, associated tissue damage, device integrity and weight-bearing capacity on an ex vivo Gallus domesticus animal model: The prototype was tested over 20 times using different traction forces. The experiment was qualitatively repeated on an ex vivo porcine model.

resultsIn the G. domesticus model, the improved needle supported forces of up to 5.75 kg F. No damage or mechanical malfunction was seen at any stage of the experiment. Needle penetration, ease of trocar insertion, system anchoring and weight-bearing capacity were rated (1-5) by four raters--mean 4.9 ± 0.31. Inter-rater agreement was high (free marginal κ 0.75). The porcine experiment revealed similar ease of use with neither complication nor damage to the abdominal wall.

conclusionsWe believe that the new Veress system is easy to use, requires no additional training, non-inferior in its capabilities compared to the traditional Veress needle, with the advantage of improving the safety of the first trocar insertion phase of the operation.

Indexed as

Abdominal WallNeedlesAnimalsChickensIatrogenic DiseaseLaparoscopyModels, AnatomicSafetySurgical InstrumentsSwineTractionLaparoscopyPatient safetySurgical complicationsVeress needle

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.