SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2015
Oral direct thrombin inhibitors or oral factor Xa inhibitors for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oral direct thrombin inhibitors or oral factor Xa inhibitors versus conventional anticoagulants for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Oral direct thrombin inhibitors or oral factor Xa inhibitors versus conventional anticoagulants for the treatment of pulmonary embolism.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Antiplatelet agents for the treatment of deep venous thrombosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.Blood advances · 2020Guideline
- Treatment of distal deep vein thrombosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Home versus in-patient treatment for deep vein thrombosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Vitamin K antagonists versus low-molecular-weight heparin for the long term treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Oral direct thrombin inhibitors or oral factor Xa inhibitors for the treatment of pulmonary embolism.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Rivaroxaban versus Low Molecular Weight Heparin for Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisPooled it
- Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Deep-Vein Thrombosis.The New England journal of medicine · 2017Trial
- Rivaroxaban Modulates TLR4/Myd88/NF-Kβ Signaling Pathway in a Dose-Dependent Manner With Suppression of Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in an Experimental Model of Depression.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Oral Anticoagulants Preference in Hospitalized Patients with Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis or Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- In reply: Is it time to initiate venothromobolism prophylaxis for acute and ambulatory outpatients with lower limb immobilisation?Emergency medicine journal : EMJ · 2020Article
- The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in noncirrhotic portal vein thrombosis.Blood advances · 2020Article
- Prevention and Treatment of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: a Review.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2019Review
- Safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus traditional anticoagulants in venous thromboembolism.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2019Review
- Postpartum deep vein thrombosis resolved by catheter-directed thrombolysis: A case report.Medicine · 2019Article
- Oral Anticoagulation.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2018Review
- Outpatient Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis in the United States: The Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke Study.Journal of hospital medicine · 2017Article
- Cerebral venous thrombosis.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDeep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a condition in which a clot forms in the deep veins, most commonly of the leg. It occurs in approximately 1 in 1,000 people. If left untreated, the clot can travel up to the lungs and cause a potentially life-threatening pulmonary embolism (PE). Previously, a DVT was treated with the anticoagulants heparin and vitamin K antagonists. However, two forms of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been developed: oral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) and oral factor Xa inhibitors. The new drugs have characteristics that may be favourable over conventional treatment, including oral administration, a predictable effect, lack of frequent monitoring or re-dosing and few known drug interactions. To date, no Cochrane review has measured the effectiveness and safety of these drugs in the treatment of DVT.
objectivesTo assess the effectiveness of oral DTIs and oral factor Xa inhibitors for the treatment of DVT. SEARCH
methodsThe Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the Specialised Register (last searched January 2015) and the Cochrane Register of Studies (last searched January 2015). We searched clinical trials databases for details of ongoing or unpublished studies and the reference lists of relevant articles retrieved by electronic searches for additional citations. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials in which people with a DVT confirmed by standard imaging techniques, were allocated to receive an oral DTI or an oral factor Xa inhibitor for the treatment of DVT. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors (LR, JM) independently extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias in the trials. Any disagreements were resolved by discussion with the third review author (PK). We performed meta-analyses when we considered heterogeneity low. The two primary outcomes were recurrent VTE and PE. Other outcomes included all-cause mortality and major bleeding. We calculated all outcomes using an odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). MAIN
resultsWe included 11 randomised controlled trials of 27,945 participants. Three studies tested oral DTIs (two dabigatran and one ximelagatran), while eight tested oral factor Xa inhibitors (four rivaroxaban, two apixaban and two edoxaban). We deemed all included studies to be of high methodological quality and low risk of bias. The quality of the evidence was graded as high as the outcomes were direct and effect estimates were consistent and precise, as reflected in the narrow CIs around the ORs. Meta-analysis of three studies (7596 participants) comparing oral DTIs with standard anticoagulation groups showed no difference in the rate of recurrent VTE (OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.80 to 1.49), recurrent DVT (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.74 to 1.58), fatal PE (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.27 to 3.70), non-fatal PE (OR 1.12; 95% CI 0.66 to 1.90) or all-cause mortality (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.60 to 1.13). However, oral DTIs were associated with reduced bleeding (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.98). Meta-analysis of eight studies (16,356 participants) comparing oral factor Xa inhibitors with standard anticoagulation demonstrated a similar rate of recurrent VTE between the two treatments (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.73 to 1.07). Oral factor Xa inhibitors were associated with a lower rate of recurrent DVT (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.98). However, this was a weak association, heavily dependent on one study. The rate of fatal (OR 1.20; 95% CI 0.71 to 2.03), non-fatal PE (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.68 to 1.28) and all-cause mortality (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.65 to 1.23) was similar between the two treatment groups. Oral factor Xa inhibitors were also associated with reduced bleeding (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.76). None of the included studies measured post-thrombotic syndrome or health-related quality of life. AUTHORS'
conclusionsNOACs such as DTIs and factor Xa inhibitors may be an effective and safe alternative to conventional anticoagulation treatment for acute DVT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.