Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26123085›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2015

Defining the RNA-binding glycine-rich (RBG) gene superfamily: new insights into nomenclature, phylogeny, and evolutionary trends obtained by genome-wide comparative analysis of Arabidopsis, Chinese cabbage, rice and maize genomes.

Panneerselvam Krishnamurthy, Jin A Kim, Mi-Jeong Jeong, Chang Ho Kang, Soo In Lee

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Panneerselvam KrishnamurthyDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, National Academy of Agricultural Science (NAAS), Jeonju, 560-500, Korea.
Jin A KimDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, National Academy of Agricultural Science (NAAS), Jeonju, 560-500, Korea.
Mi-Jeong JeongDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, National Academy of Agricultural Science (NAAS), Jeonju, 560-500, Korea.
Chang Ho KangDivision of Applied Life Science and PMBBRC, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, 660-701, Korea.
Soo In LeeDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, National Academy of Agricultural Science (NAAS), Jeonju, 560-500, Korea. silee@korea.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA-binding glycine-rich (RBG) proteins play diverse roles in plant growth, development, protection and genome organization. An overly broad definition for class IV glycine-rich proteins (GRPs), namely RNA-binding activity and a glycine-rich C-terminus, has resulted in many distantly related and/or non-related proteins being grouped into this class of RBGs. This definition has hampered the study of RBG evolution. In this study, we used a comparative genomic approach consisting of ortholog, homolog, synteny and phylogenetic analyses to legitimately exclude all distantly/non-related proteins from class IV GRPs and to identify 15, 22, 12 and 18 RBG proteins in Arabidopsis, Chinese cabbage, rice and maize genomes, respectively. All identified RBGs could be divided into three subclasses, namely RBGA, RBGB and RBGD, which may be derived from a common ancestor. We assigned RBGs excluded from class IV GRPs to a separate RBG superfamily. RBGs have evolved and diversified in different species via different mechanisms; segmental duplication and recombination have had major effects, with tandem duplication, intron addition/deletion and domain recombination/deletion playing minor roles. Loss and retention of duplicated RBGs after polyploidization has been species and subclass specific. For example, following recent whole-genome duplication and triplication in maize and Chinese cabbage, respectively, most duplicated copies of RBGA have been lost in maize while RBGD duplicates have been retained; in Chinese cabbage, in contrast, RBGA duplicates have been retained while RBGD duplicates have been lost. Our findings reveal fundamental information and shed new light on the structural characteristics and evolutionary dynamics of RBGs.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularMultigene FamilyPhylogenyTerminology as TopicChromosomes, PlantGenome, PlantGlycinePlant ProteinsPlantsRecombination, GeneticRNA-Binding ProteinsSpecies SpecificityGlycinePlant ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsComparative genomicsEvolutionary patternsGene/protein superfamilyPolyploidizationRNA-binding glycine-rich proteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.