Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26122891›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychiatry2015

Frequency and change mechanisms of psychotherapy among depressed patients: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial comparing twice-weekly versus once-weekly sessions of CBT and IPT.

Sanne J E Bruijniks, Judith Bosmans, Frenk P M L Peeters, Steven D Hollon, Patricia van Oppen, Michael van den Boogaard, Pieter Dingemanse, Pim Cuijpers, Arnoud Arntz, Gerdien Franx and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06537791 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Multidisciplinary Home-Based Rehabilitation Program for Individuals With Disabilities: A Retrospective Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorCorporación de Rehabilitación Club de Leones Cruz del SurRan2023 to 2023Enrolled270ConditionsMusculoskeletal Diseases, Neurological DiseasesArmsHome-Based Rehabilitation Program
NCT06790030 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Does Self-Efficacy at the Start of Treatment Predict Treatment Outcome in Patients With EDs?

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAltrechtRan2023 to 2025Enrolled50ConditionsEating DisordersArmsCBT-T
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sanne J E BruijniksDepartment of Clinical Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, and EMGO Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. s.j.e.bruijniks@vu.nl.
Judith BosmansDepartment of Health Sciences, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Section of Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.e.bosmans@vu.nl.
Frenk P M L PeetersDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, University Hospital Maastricht; School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands. f.peeters@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Steven D HollonDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. steven.d.hollon@vanderbilt.edu.
Patricia van OppenDepartment of Psychiatry, VU Medical Centre/GGZ ingeest, and the EMGO Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p.vanoppen@ggzingeest.nl.
Michael van den BoogaardPsyQ, Parnassia Groep, Hague, Netherlands. M.vandenBoogaard@psyq.nl.
Pieter DingemanseAltrecht Institute for Mental Health Care, Utrecht, Netherlands. p.dingemanse@altrecht.nl.
Pim CuijpersDepartment of Clinical Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, and EMGO Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p.cuijpers@vu.nl.
Arnoud ArntzDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. A.R.Arntz@uva.nl.
Gerdien FranxTrimbos-institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands. gfranx@trimbos.nl.
Marcus J H HuibersDepartment of Clinical Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, and EMGO Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.j.h.huibers@vu.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and interpersonal therapy (IPT) are among the most well established therapies for the treatment of depression. However, some major questions remain unanswered. First, it is unknown what session frequency results in the most optimal (cost) effectiveness in psychotherapy. Second, the debate as to what mechanisms underlie the effect of psychotherapy has not yet been resolved. Enhancing knowledge about the optimal session frequency and mechanisms of change seems crucial in order to optimize the (cost) effectiveness of psychotherapy for depression. This study aims to compare treatment outcome of twice-weekly versus once-weekly sessions of CBT and IPT. We expect twice-weekly sessions to be more effective and lead to more rapid recovery of depressive symptoms in comparison to once-weekly sessions. Both therapy-specific and non-specific process measures will be included to unravel the mechanisms of change in psychotherapy for depression. Besides the use of self-reports and behavioral observations, this study will also examine underlying biological processes by collecting blood samples.

methodIn a multicenter randomized trial, two hundred depressed patients will be recruited from Dutch specialized mental healthcare centers and randomized into one of the following groups, all receiving a maximum of 20 sessions in different frequencies: a) twice-weekly sessions at the start of CBT, b) twice-weekly sessions at the start of IPT, c) once-weekly sessions at the start of CBT, d) once-weekly sessions at the start of IPT. Primary outcome measures are depression severity, cost-effectiveness and quality of life. Process measures include therapeutic alliance, recall, therapy-specific skills, motivation and compliance. Assessments will take place during baseline, monthly during treatment and follow-up at month 9, 12 and 24. In addition, at 12 and 24 months, the frequency of depressive episodes in the previous year will be assessed. Blood samples will be taken pre- and post-treatment. The study has been ethically approved and registered. DISCUSSION: Finding that twice-weekly sessions are more effective or lead to more rapid recovery of depressive symptoms could lead to treatment adaptations that have the potential to reduce the personal and societal burden of depression. In addition, insight into the mechanisms of change and physiological processes in psychotherapy will enable us to optimize treatments and may help to understand human functioning beyond the context of treatment.

trial registrationThe study has been registered on October 21th, 2014 at the Netherlands Trial Register, part of the Dutch Cochrane Centre ( NTR4856 ).

Indexed as

AdultAgedClinical ProtocolsCognitive Behavioral TherapyCost-Benefit AnalysisDepressionFemaleHumansMaleNetherlandsPatient CompliancePsychotherapy, BriefTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26122891
PMCPMC4486419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.