ArticleeLife2015
Strategies from UW-Madison for rescuing biomedical research in the US.
Article in eLife, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Interdisciplinarity at the nexus of biomedical science training: The R3 Center for Innovation in Science Education.iScience · 2025Article
- Choosing Wisely: Applying Value-Based Economic Principles to Population Science Research Investment.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024Article
- An evaluation of programs to support new investigators at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases: Striking a balance with funding for established investigators.Evaluation and program planning · 2023Article
- Biomedical Research COVID-19 Impact Assessment: Lessons Learned and Compelling Needs.NAM perspectives · 2021Review
- Applying inter-rater reliability to improve consistency in classifying PhD career outcomes.F1000Research · 2020Article
- mSphere of Influence: a Sphere of Influence beyond the Bench Can Help Shape the Future of U.S. Research.mSphere · 2019Article
- Personalized postdoctoral fellowship care.Nature biotechnology · 2018Article
- Outcomes of early NIH-funded investigators: Experience of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.PloS one · 2018Article
- Article
- Opinion: The Next Generation Researchers Initiative at NIH.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- The argument for diversifying the NIH grant portfolio.Molecular biology of the cell · 2017Article
- Article
- Taking Stock of theGenetics · 2017Review
- Future of fundamental discovery in US biomedical research.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- Five suggestions for substantial NIH reforms.eLife · 2016Article
- Enhancing Graduate and Postdoctoral Education To Create a Sustainable Biomedical Workforce.Human gene therapy · 2016Article
- Labor and skills gap analysis of the biomedical research workforce.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2016Article
- Young Investigator Perspectives. Rethinking the biomedical postdoc: but first let's get the data.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2016Article
- Preparing future professionals by enhancing workforce readiness.Nature biotechnology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A cross-campus, cross-career stage and cross-disciplinary series of discussions at a large public university has produced a series of recommendations for addressing the problems confronting the biomedical research community in the US.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.