Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26122756›Full record

Trial reportAppetite2015

Training response inhibition to food is associated with weight loss and reduced energy intake.

Natalia S Lawrence, Jamie O'Sullivan, David Parslow, Mahmood Javaid, Rachel C Adams, Christopher D Chambers, Katarina Kos, Frederick Verbruggen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Appetite, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04450524 (Changing Eating Behavior Using Cognitive Training), which is not on this map. Cited by 95 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04450524 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Changing Eating Behavior Using Cognitive Training: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBabes-Bolyai UniversityRan2020 to 2021Enrolled135ConditionsObesity, Overweight, Weight LossArmsHypnosis, Food inhibition training, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Does alcohol cue inhibitory control training survive a context shift?Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2020
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Natalia S LawrenceSchool of Psychology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK. Electronic address: Natalia.Lawrence@exeter.ac.uk.
Jamie O'SullivanSchool of Psychology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK. Electronic address: jaymeosullivan@gmail.com.
David ParslowSchool of Psychology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK. Electronic address: David.Parslow@exeter.ac.uk.
Mahmood JavaidSchool of Psychology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK. Electronic address: M.Javaid@exeter.ac.uk.
Rachel C AdamsSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, UK. Electronic address: AdamsRC1@cardiff.ac.uk.
Christopher D ChambersSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, UK. Electronic address: Chambersc1@cardiff.ac.uk.
Katarina KosUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Barrack Road, Exeter, EX2 5DW, UK. Electronic address: K.Kos@exeter.ac.uk.
Frederick VerbruggenSchool of Psychology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK. Electronic address: F.L.J.Verbruggen@exeter.ac.uk.

Funding

European Research Council 312445Wellcome Trust WT097835MF
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of adults in the UK and US are overweight or obese due to multiple factors including excess energy intake. Training people to inhibit simple motor responses (key presses) to high-energy density food pictures reduces intake in laboratory studies. We examined whether online response inhibition training reduced real-world food consumption and weight in a community sample of adults who were predominantly overweight or obese (N = 83). Participants were allocated in a randomised, double-blind design to receive four 10-min sessions of either active or control go/no-go training in which either high-energy density snack foods (active) or non-food stimuli (control) were associated with no-go signals. Participants' weight, energy intake (calculated from 24-h food diaries), daily snacking frequency and subjective food evaluations were measured for one week pre- and post-intervention. Participants also provided self-reported weight and monthly snacking frequency at pre-intervention screening, and one month and six months after completing the study. Participants in the active relative to control condition showed significant weight loss, reductions in daily energy intake and a reduction in rated liking of high-energy density (no-go) foods from the pre-to post-intervention week. There were no changes in self-reported daily snacking frequency. At longer-term follow-up, the active group showed significant reductions in self-reported weight at six months, whilst both groups reported significantly less snacking at one- and six-months. Excellent rates of adherence (97%) and positive feedback about the training suggest that this intervention is acceptable and has the potential to improve public health by reducing energy intake and overweight.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalAdultAgedBehavior TherapyDiet RecordsDouble-Blind MethodEnergy IntakeFeeding BehaviorFemaleFood PreferencesHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityOverweightSnacksCognitive trainingDisinhibitionEnergy intakeFood likingResponse inhibitionWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID26122756
PMCPMC4596151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.