Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26122736›Full record

ArticleMicrobial cell factories2015

Identification of enhanced hydrogen and ethanol Escherichia coli producer strains in a glycerol-based medium by screening in single-knock out mutant collections.

Antonio Valle, Gema Cabrera, Domingo Cantero, Jorge Bolivar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial cell factories, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Proteomic profiling ofTurkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Metabolomics ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Antonio ValleDepartment of Biomedicine, Biotechnology and Public Health-Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Agroalimentario (ceiA3), Institute of Biomolecules, University of Cádiz, Avda República Saharui s/n, 11510, Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain. antonio.valle@uca.es.
Gema CabreraDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Food Technology, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Agroalimentario (ceiA3), University of Cádiz, Avda República Saharui s/n, 11510, Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain. gema.cabrera@uca.es.
Domingo CanteroDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Food Technology, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Agroalimentario (ceiA3), University of Cádiz, Avda República Saharui s/n, 11510, Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain. domingo.cantero@uca.es.
Jorge BolivarDepartment of Biomedicine, Biotechnology and Public Health-Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Agroalimentario (ceiA3), Institute of Biomolecules, University of Cádiz, Avda República Saharui s/n, 11510, Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain. jorge.bolivar@uca.es.
Universidad de Cádiz · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarth's climate is warming as a result of anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases from fossil fuel combustion. Bioenergy, which includes biodiesel, biohydrogen and bioethanol, has emerged as a sustainable alternative fuel source. For this reason, in recent years biodiesel production has become widespread but this industry currently generates a huge amount of glycerol as a by-product, which has become an environmental problem in its own right. A feasible possibility to solve this problem is the use of waste glycerol as a carbon source for microbial transformation into biofuels such as hydrogen and ethanol. For instance, Escherichia coli is a microorganism that can synthesize these compounds under anaerobic conditions.

resultsIn this work an experimental procedure was established for screening E. coli single mutants to identify strains with enhanced ethanol and/or H2 productions compared to the wild type strain. In an initial screening of 150 single mutants, 12 novel strains (gnd, tdcE, rpiA nanE, tdcB, deoB, sucB, cpsG, frmA, glgC, fumA and gadB) were found to provide enhanced yields for at least one of the target products. The mutations, that improve most significantly the parameters evaluated (gnd and tdcE genes), were combined with other mutations in three engineered E. coli mutant strains in order to further redirect carbon flux towards the desired products.

conclusionsThis methodology can be a useful tool to disclose the metabolic pathways that are more susceptible to manipulation in order to obtain higher molar yields of hydrogen and ethanol using glycerol as main carbon source in multiple E. coli mutants.

Indexed as

Culture MediaEscherichia coliEthanolFermentationGene Knockout TechniquesGenetic EngineeringGlycerolHydrogenMutationCulture MediaEthanolGlycerolHydrogen

Identifiers

PMID26122736
PMCPMC4485358
OpenAlexW1869592094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.