Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26122637›Full record

ArticleDer Nervenarzt2015

[New therapeutic strategies for remyelination in multiple sclerosis].

D Kremer, H-P Hartung, M Stangel, P Küry

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D KremerNeurologische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf , Deutschland.
H-P Hartung
M Stangel
P Küry
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is characterized by oligodendrocyte death and myelin sheath destruction of the central nervous system (CNS) in response to autoinflammatory processes. Besides demyelination axonal degeneration constitutes the second histopathological hallmark of this disease. A large number of immunomodulatory and targeted immunosuppression treatments have been approved for relapsing remitting (RR) MS where they effectively reduce relapse rates; however, currently no treatment options exist to repair injured axonal tracts or myelin damage that accumulates over time particularly in progressive MS. In light of the growing available therapeutic repertoire of highly potent immunomodulatory medications there is an increasing interest in the development of therapies aimed at neutralizing neurodegenerative damage. Endogenous remyelination processes occur mainly as a result of oligodendrocyte precursor cell (OPC) activation, recruitment and maturation; however, this repair activity appears to be limited and increasingly fails during disease progression. Based on these observations OPCs are considered as promising targets for the regenerative treatment of all stages of MS. This article presents an overview of approved medications with a suggested role in regeneration, regenerative treatments that are currently being tested in clinical trials, as well as promising future therapeutic approaches derived from basic glial cell research aiming at the promotion of the endogenous repair activity of the brain.

Indexed as

HumansImmunologic FactorsImmunosuppressive AgentsMultiple SclerosisNerve RegenerationNeuroprotective AgentsOligodendrogliaImmunologic FactorsImmunosuppressive AgentsNeuroprotective Agents

Identifiers

PMID26122637
OpenAlexW847812975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.