Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26122543›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2015

The diagnostic value of dopamine transporter imaging and olfactory testing in patients with parkinsonian syndromes.

Charalampos Georgiopoulos, Anette Davidsson, Maria Engström, Elna-Marie Larsson, Helene Zachrisson, Nil Dizdar

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Degree of dopaminergic degeneration measured byNeural regeneration research · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Charalampos GeorgiopoulosDepartment of Radiology, Linköping University, 581 85, Linköping, Sweden. charalampos.georgiopoulos@regionostergotland.se.
Anette DavidssonDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Linköping University, 581 85, Linköping, Sweden.
Maria EngströmDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, 581 85, Linköping, Sweden.
Elna-Marie LarssonDepartment of Surgical Sciences/Radiology, Uppsala University, Akademiska sjukhuset, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
Helene ZachrissonDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Linköping University, 581 85, Linköping, Sweden.
Nil DizdarDepartment of Neurology, Linköping University, 581 85, Linköping, Sweden.
Linköping University · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of olfactory testing and presynaptic dopamine imaging in diagnosing Parkinson's disease (PD) and atypical parkinsonian syndromes (APS); to evaluate if the combination of these two diagnostic tools can improve their diagnostic value. A prospective investigation of 24 PD patients, 16 APS patients and 15 patients with non-parkinsonian syndromes was performed during an 18-month period. Single photon emission computed tomography with the presynaptic radioligand (123)I-FP-CIT (DaTSCAN(®)) and olfactory testing with the Brief 12-item Smell Identification Test (B-SIT) were performed in all patients. DaTSCAN was analysed semi-quantitatively, by calculating two different striatal uptake ratios, and visually according to a predefined ranking scale. B-SIT score was significantly lower for PD patients, but not significantly different between APS and non-parkinsonism. The visual assessment of DaTSCAN had higher sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy compared to olfactory testing. Most PD patients (75%) had visually predominant dopamine depletion in putamen, while most APS patients (56%) had visually severe dopamine depletion both in putamen and in caudate nucleus. The combination of DaTSCAN and B-SIT led to a higher rate of correctly classified patients. Olfactory testing can distinguish PD from non-parkinsonism, but not PD from APS or APS from non-parkinsonism. DaTSCAN is more efficient than olfactory testing and can be valuable in differentiating PD from APS. However, combining olfactory testing and DaTSCAN imaging has a higher predictive value than these two methods separately.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBrainDiagnosis, DifferentialDopamine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOlfactory PathwaysParkinson DiseaseParkinsonian DisordersRadionuclide ImagingSmellDopamine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins123I-FP-CIT SPECTAtypical parkinsonismOlfactionParkinsonian syndromesParkinson’s disease

Identifiers

PMID26122543
OpenAlexW2187775075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.