Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26122518›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2015

The SEQUEST family tree.

David L Tabb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The Environment-Dependent Regulatory Landscape of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Integrative Kinase Activity Profiling and Phosphoproteomics ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Using Proteomic Approaches to Unravel the Response ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

David L TabbSchool of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37232-8575, USA. david.l.tabb@vanderbilt.edu.
Vanderbilt University · US

Funding

Vanderbilt Proteome Characterization CenterU24CA159988 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI LIEBLER, DANIEL C · 2011 to 2016
$13.9M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA159988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its introduction in 1994, SEQUEST has gained many important new capabilities, and a host of successor algorithms have built upon its successes. This Account and Perspective maps the evolution of this important tool and charts the relationships among contributions to the SEQUEST legacy. Many of the changes represented improvements in computing speed by clusters and graphics cards. Mass spectrometry innovations in mass accuracy and activation methods led to shifts in fragment modeling and scoring strategies. These changes, as well as the movement of laboratories and lab members, have led to great diversity among the members of the SEQUEST family. Graphical Abstract ᅟ.

Indexed as

ProteomicsSoftwareTandem Mass SpectrometryAlgorithmsBioinformaticsHistoryIntellectual propertyProteomicsSEQUEST

Identifiers

PMID26122518
PMCPMC4607603
OpenAlexW784462454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.