ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2015
Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia: a Genetic and Clinical Update.
Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia with ring sideroblasts/Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- The effects of MYC on tumor immunity and immunotherapy.Cell death discovery · 2023Review
- Phenotypic characterization of leukemia-initiating stem cells in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.Leukemia · 2021Article
- Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia: Hematopathology Perspective.Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2021Review
- Chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia stem cell transcriptomes anticipate disease morphology and outcome.EBioMedicine · 2020Article
- Proposed diagnostic criteria for classical chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), CMML variants and pre-CMML conditions.Haematologica · 2019Review
- A medical mirroring: chronic myelomonocytic leukemia mimicking immunoglobulin G4-related disease.American journal of translational research · 2019Article
- Recent Updates on Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2018Review
- Establishment and validation of a novel risk model for estimating time to first treatment in 120 patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2018Article
- Cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.Blood cancer journal · 2016Review
- Prognostic interaction between ASXL1 and TET2 mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.Blood cancer journal · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal stem cell disorder, characterized by peripheral blood monocytosis and overlapping features between myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Clonal cytogenetic changes are seen in up to 30 % patients, while approximately 90 % have detectable molecular abnormalities. Most patients are diagnosed in the seventh decade of life. Gene mutations in ten-eleven translocation (TET) oncogene family member 2 (TET2) (60 %), SRSF2 (50 %), ASXL1 (40 %), and RAS (20-30 %) are frequent, with only frame shift and nonsense ASXL1 mutations negatively impacting overall survival. With the lack of formal guidelines, management and response criteria are often extrapolated from MDS and MPN. Contemporary molecularly integrated CMML-specific prognostic models include the Groupe Francais des Myelodysplasies (GFM) model and the Molecular Mayo Model, both incorporating ASXL1 mutational status. Hypomethylating agents and allogeneic stem cell transplant remain the two most commonly used treatment strategies, with suboptimal results. Clinical trials exploiting epigenetic and signal pathway abnormalities, frequent in CMML, offer hope and promise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26122388What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.