ArticleJournal of microbiological methods2015
Codon-optimized fluorescent mTFP and mCherry for microscopic visualization and genetic counterselection of streptococci and enterococci.
Article in Journal of microbiological methods, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Streptococcus anginosus activates the NLRP3 inflammasome to promote inflammatory responses from macrophages.Journal of leukocyte biology · 2026Article
- PPT1 selectively depalmitoylates GAP43 to regulate neuronal excitability and cognitive function.Science advances · 2026Article
- A modular genetic toolbox for precise gene regulation and multi-color imaging in streptococci.microLife · 2026Article
- A Defined Artificial Saliva Medium Allows Characterization of the Hypothiocyanite Response of Streptococcus sanguinis and Streptococcus mutans.Molecular oral microbiology · 2025Article
- Design, development, and validation of new fluorescent strains for studying oral streptococci.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Dextranase enhances nanoparticle penetration ofJournal of oral microbiology · 2025Article
- Intraspecies interactions ofmSphere · 2024Article
- A novel infective endocarditis virulence factor related to multiple functions for bacterial survival in blood was discovered inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Intraspecies interactions ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Illuminating the oral microbiome and its host interactions: tools and approaches for molecular microbiology studies.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2023Review
- Spatiotemporal monitoring of a periodontal multispecies biofilm model: demonstration of prebiotic treatment responses.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Manganese transport by Streptococcus sanguinis in acidic conditions and its impact on growth in vitro and in vivo.Molecular microbiology · 2022Article
- Understanding Lactobacillus paracasei and Streptococcus oralis Biofilm Interactions through Agent-Based Modeling.mSphere · 2021Article
- Involvement of Chromosomally Encoded Homologs of the RRNPP Protein Family in Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm Formation and Urinary Tract Infection Pathogenesis.Journal of bacteriology · 2020Article
- Efficacy of Lytic Phage Cocktails onViruses · 2020Article
- Role of FAD-I in Fusobacterial Interspecies Interaction and Biofilm Formation.Microorganisms · 2020Article
- Fluorescent reporter plasmids for single-cell and bulk-level composition assays in E. faecalis.PloS one · 2020Article
- Fluorescence Tools Adapted for Real-Time Monitoring of the Behaviors ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2019Article
- The Combined Use of Tea Polyphenols and Lactobacillus Plantarum ST8SH Bacteriocin in a Rabbit Model of Infection Following Femoral Fracture with Internal Fixation.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the powerful potential of fluorescent proteins for labeling bacteria, their use has been limited in multi-species oral biofilm models. Fermentative metabolism by streptococcal species that initiate biofilm colonization results in an acidic, reduced microenvironment that may limit the activities of some fluorescent proteins which are influenced by pH and oxygen availability. The need to reliably distinguish morphologically similar strains within biofilms was the impetus for this work. Teal fluorescent protein (mTFP1) and red fluorescent protein (mCherry) were chosen because their fluorescent properties made them promising candidates. Since tRNA availability has been implicated in efficient translation of sufficient quantities of protein for maximum fluorescence, a streptococcal codon optimization approach was used. DNA was synthesized to encode either protein using codons most frequently used in streptococci; each coding region was preceded by an engineered ribosomal binding site and restriction sites for cloning a promoter. Plasmids carrying this synthesized DNA under control of the Streptococcus mutans lactate dehydrogenase promoter conferred fluorescence to nine representative streptococcal and two Enterococcus faecalis strains. Further characterization in Streptococcus gordonii showed that mTFP1 and mCherry expressions could be detected in cells grown planktonically, in biofilms, or in colonies on agar when expressed on an extrachromosomal plasmid or in single copy integrated into the chromosome. This latter property facilitated counterselection of chromosomal mutations demonstrating value for bacterial strain construction. Fluorescent and non-fluorescent bacteria were distinguishable at acidic pH. These codon-optimized versions of mTFP1 and mCherry have promising potential for use in multiple experimental applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.