Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26122297›Full record

ArticleHormones and behavior2015

Trajectories and phenotypes with estrogen exposures across the lifespan: What does Goldilocks have to do with it?

Stephanie V Koebele, Heather A Bimonte-Nelson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hormones and behavior, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Menopause, hormone therapy and cognition: maximizing translation from preclinical research.Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie V KoebeleDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA; Arizona Alzheimer's Consortium, Phoenix, AZ 85006, USA.
Heather A Bimonte-NelsonDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA; Arizona Alzheimer's Consortium, Phoenix, AZ 85006, USA. Electronic address: bimonte.nelson@asu.edu.
Alzheimer's Association · USArizona Alzheimer’s Consortium

Funding

Variations in Hormone Therapy: Effects on Cognition and Markers of Brain AgingR01AG028084 · NIA · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI BIMONTE-NELSON, HEATHER ALLYSON · 2007 to 2022
$4.7M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG028084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article is part of a Special Issue "Estradiol and cognition". Estrogens impact the organization and activation of the mammalian brain in both sexes, with sex-specific critical windows. Throughout the female lifespan estrogens activate brain substrates previously organized by estrogens, and estrogens can induce non-transient brain and behavior changes into adulthood. Therefore, from early life through the transition to reproductive senescence and beyond, estrogens are potent modulators of the brain and behavior. Organizational, reorganizational, and activational hormone events likely impact the trajectory of brain profiles during aging. A "brain profile," or quantitative brain measurement for research purposes, is typically a snapshot in time, but in life a brain profile is anything but static--it is in flux, variable, and dynamic. Akin to this, the only thing continuous and consistent about hormone exposures across a female's lifespan is that they are noncontinuous and inconsistent, building and rebuilding on past exposures to create a present brain and behavioral landscape. Thus, hormone variation is especially rich in females, and is likely the destiny for maximal responsiveness in the female brain. The magnitude and direction of estrogenic effects on the brain and its functions depend on a myriad of factors; a "Goldilocks" phenomenon exists for estrogens, whereby if the timing, dose, and regimen for an individual are just right, markedly efficacious effects present. Data indicate that exogenously-administered estrogens can bestow beneficial cognitive effects in some circumstances, especially when initiated in a window of opportunity such as the menopause transition. Could it be that the age-related reduction in efficacy of estrogens reflects the closure of a late-in-life critical window occurring around the menopause transition? Information from classic and contemporary works studying organizational/activational estrogen actions, in combination with acknowledging the tendency for maximal responsiveness to cyclicity, will elucidate ways to extend sensitivity and efficacy into post-menopause.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainCognitionDose-Response Relationship, DrugEstrogensFemaleHumansLongevityMaleMenopausePhenotypePostmenopauseSex DifferentiationSexual BehaviorTime FactorsEstrogensActivationalAgingBrainDevelopmentEstrogenFemaleHormonesMemoryMenopauseOrganizational

Identifiers

PMID26122297
PMCPMC4829405
OpenAlexW750398379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.