Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26122282›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics2015

Validity of energy intake estimated by digital photography plus recall in overweight and obese young adults.

Lauren T Ptomey, Erik A Willis, Jeffery J Honas, Matthew S Mayo, Richard A Washburn, Stephen D Herrmann, Debra K Sullivan, Joseph E Donnelly

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03146156 (Lifestyle Intervention in Preparation for Pregnancy), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03146156 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Lifestyle Intervention in Preparation for Pregnancy (LIPP)

TypeinterventionalSponsorTufts Medical CenterRan2017 to 2025Enrolled99ConditionsObesity, Lifestyle-related Condition, Macrosomia, FetalArmsLifestyle Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Clinical assessment for diet prescription.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lauren T Ptomey
Erik A Willis
Jeffery J Honas
Matthew S Mayo
Richard A Washburn
Stephen D Herrmann
Debra K Sullivan
Joseph E Donnelly

Funding

LONG-TERM EXERCISE WEIGHT LOSS AND ENERGY BALANCER01DK049181 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA KEARNEY · PI DONNELLY, JOSEPH E. · 1996 to 2009
$3.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK049181NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK049181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent reports have questioned the adequacy of self-report measures of dietary intake as the basis for scientific conclusions regarding the associations of dietary intake and health, and reports have recommended the development and evaluation of better methods for the assessment of dietary intake in free-living individuals. We developed a procedure that used pre- and post-meal digital photographs in combination with dietary recalls (DP+R) to assess energy intake during ad libitum eating in a cafeteria setting.

objectiveTo compare mean daily energy intake of overweight and obese young adults assessed by a DP+R method with mean total daily energy expenditure assessed by doubly labeled water (TDEE(DLW)).

methodsEnergy intake was assessed using the DP+R method in 91 overweight and obese young adults (age = 22.9±3.2 years, body mass index [BMI; calculated as kg/m(2)]=31.2±5.6, female=49%) over 7 days of ad libitum eating in a university cafeteria. Foods consumed outside the cafeteria (ie, snacks, non-cafeteria meals) were assessed using multiple-pass recall procedures, using food models and standardized, neutral probing questions. TDEE(DLW) was assessed in all participants over the 14-day period.

resultsThe mean energy intakes estimated by DP+R and TDEE(DLW) were not significantly different (DP+R=2912±661 kcal/d; TDEE(DLW)=2849±748 kcal/d, P=0.42). The DP+R method overestimated TDEE(DLW) by 63±750 kcal/d (6.8±28%).

conclusionResults suggest that the DP+R method provides estimates of energy intake comparable to those obtained by TDEE(DLW).

Indexed as

Energy IntakeExerciseMealsAdolescentAdultCombined Modality TherapyDiet RecordsEnergy MetabolismFemaleFood ServicesHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMental RecallObesityOverweightDiet intakeDigital photographyDoubly labeled waterEnergy balanceFood records

Identifiers

PMID26122282
PMCPMC4555004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.