Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26122266›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2015

Isoprene emission by poplar is not important for the feeding behaviour of poplar leaf beetles.

Anna Müller, Moritz Kaling, Patrick Faubert, Gerrit Gort, Hans M Smid, Joop J A Van Loon, Marcel Dicke, Basem Kanawati, Philippe Schmitt-Kopplin, Andrea Polle and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna MüllerBüsgen Institute, Forest Botany and Tree Physiology, University of Göttingen, Büsgenweg 2, 37077, Göttingen, Germany. anna.mueller@forst.uni-goettingen.de.
Moritz KalingResearch Unit Environmental Simulation, Institute of Biochemical Plant Pathology, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany. moritz.kaling@helmholtz-muenchen.de.
Patrick FaubertResearch Unit Environmental Simulation, Institute of Biochemical Plant Pathology, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany. Patrick1_Faubert@uqac.ca.
Gerrit GortMathematical and Statistical Methods Group, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 100, 6700 AC, Wageningen, Netherlands. gerrit.gort@wur.nl.
Hans M SmidLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 8031, NL-6700 EH, Wageningen, Netherlands. hansm.smid@wur.nl.
Joop J A Van LoonLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 8031, NL-6700 EH, Wageningen, Netherlands. joop.vanloon@wur.nl.
Marcel DickeLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 8031, NL-6700 EH, Wageningen, Netherlands. marcel.dicke@wur.nl.
Basem KanawatiResearch Unit Analytical BioGeoChemistry, Helmholtz Zentrum München, D-85764, Neuherberg, Germany. basem.kanawati@helmholtz-muenchen.de.
Philippe Schmitt-KopplinResearch Unit Analytical BioGeoChemistry, Helmholtz Zentrum München, D-85764, Neuherberg, Germany. schmitt-kopplin@helmholtz-muenchen.de.
Andrea PolleBüsgen Institute, Forest Botany and Tree Physiology, University of Göttingen, Büsgenweg 2, 37077, Göttingen, Germany. apolle@gwdg.de.
Jörg-Peter SchnitzlerResearch Unit Environmental Simulation, Institute of Biochemical Plant Pathology, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany. jp.schnitzler@helmholtz-muenchen.de.
Maaria RosenkranzResearch Unit Environmental Simulation, Institute of Biochemical Plant Pathology, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany. maaria.rosenkranz@helmholtz-muenchen.de.
Helmholtz Zentrum München · DEWageningen University & Research · NLUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChrysomela populi (poplar leaf beetle) is a common herbivore in poplar plantations whose infestation causes major economic losses. Because plant volatiles act as infochemicals, we tested whether isoprene, the main volatile organic compound (VOC) produced by poplars (Populus x canescens), affects the performance of C. populi employing isoprene emitting (IE) and transgenic isoprene non-emitting (NE) plants. Our hypothesis was that isoprene is sensed and affects beetle orientation or that the lack of isoprene affects plant VOC profiles and metabolome with consequences for C. populi feeding.

resultsElectroantennographic analysis revealed that C. populi can detect higher terpenes, but not isoprene. In accordance to the inability to detect isoprene, C. populi showed no clear preference for IE or NE poplar genotypes in the choice experiments, however, the beetles consumed a little bit less leaf mass and laid fewer eggs on NE poplar trees in field experiments. Slight differences in the profiles of volatile terpenoids between IE and NE genotypes were detected by gas chromatography - mass spectrometry. Non-targeted metabolomics analysis by Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometer revealed genotype-, time- and herbivore feeding-dependent metabolic changes both in the infested and adjacent undamaged leaves under field conditions.

conclusionsWe show for the first time that C. populi is unable to sense isoprene. The detected minor differences in insect feeding in choice experiments and field bioassays may be related to the revealed changes in leaf volatile emission and metabolite composition between the IE and NE poplars. Overall our results indicate that lacking isoprene emission is of minor importance for C. populi herbivory under natural conditions, and that the lack of isoprene is not expected to change the economic losses in poplar plantations caused by C. populi infestation.

Indexed as

ChemotaxisHerbivoryAnimalsBiomassButadienesColeopteraFemaleFood ChainForestryHemiterpenesMaleMetabolomePentanesPlant LeavesPlants, Genetically ModifiedPopulusButadienesHemiterpenesisoprenePentanesVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID26122266
PMCPMC4486431
OpenAlexW2146179620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.