Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26121976›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2015

Anticancer drug sensitivity prediction in cell lines from baseline gene expression through recursive feature selection.

Zuoli Dong, Naiqian Zhang, Chun Li, Haiyun Wang, Yun Fang, Jun Wang, Xiaoqi Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Predictive Modeling of Anticancer Drug Sensitivity Using REFINED CNN.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zuoli DongDepartment of Mathematics, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China. shnu_dzl@sina.com.
Naiqian ZhangDepartment of Mathematics, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China. naiqian@wfu.edu.cn.
Chun LiDepartment of Mathematics, Bohai University, Jinzhou, China. lichwun@163.com.
Haiyun WangDepartment of Bioinformatics, School of Life Science and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China. wanghaiyun@tongji.edu.cn.
Yun FangDepartment of Mathematics, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China. fangyun0919@shnu.edu.cn.
Jun WangDepartment of Mathematics, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China. jwang@shnu.edu.cn.
Xiaoqi ZhengDepartment of Mathematics, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China. zheng.shnu@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn enduring challenge in personalized medicine is to select right drug for individual patients. Testing drugs on patients in large clinical trials is one way to assess their efficacy and toxicity, but it is impractical to test hundreds of drugs currently under development. Therefore the preclinical prediction model is highly expected as it enables prediction of drug response to hundreds of cell lines in parallel.

methodsRecently, two large-scale pharmacogenomic studies screened multiple anticancer drugs on over 1000 cell lines in an effort to elucidate the response mechanism of anticancer drugs. To this aim, we here used gene expression features and drug sensitivity data in Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) to build a predictor based on Support Vector Machine (SVM) and a recursive feature selection tool. Robustness of our model was validated by cross-validation and an independent dataset, the Cancer Genome Project (CGP).

resultsOur model achieved good cross validation performance for most drugs in the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (≥80% accuracy for 10 drugs, ≥75% accuracy for 19 drugs). Independent tests on eleven common drugs between CCLE and CGP achieved satisfactory performance for three of them, i.e., AZD6244, Erlotinib and PD-0325901, using expression levels of only twelve, six and seven genes, respectively.

conclusionsThese results suggest that drug response could be effectively predicted from genomic features. Our model could be applied to predict drug response for some certain drugs and potentially play a complementary role in personalized medicine.

Indexed as

Precision MedicineAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasmsSupport Vector MachineAntineoplastic AgentsNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26121976
PMCPMC4485860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.