Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26121911›Full record

ArticleCell proliferation2015

Enhanced osteoconductivity of polyethersulphone nanofibres loaded with bioactive glass nanoparticles in in vitro and in vivo models.

A Ardeshirylajimi, S Farhadian, F Jamshidi Adegani, S Mirzaei, M Soufi Zomorrod, L Langroudi, A Doostmohammadi, E Seyedjafari, M Soleimani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell proliferation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Polyethersulfone Polymer for Biomedical Applications and Biotechnology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Open fractures: Current treatment perspective.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2023
    Article
  4. Cell Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Treatment of critical-sized bone defects: clinical and tissue engineering perspectives.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

A ArdeshirylajimiDepartment of Stem Cell Biology, Stem Cell Technology Research Center, Tehran, 1997775555, Iran.
S FarhadianFaculty of Dentistry, Semmelweis University, Budapest, 1088, Hungary.
F Jamshidi AdeganiDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering, Stem Cell Technology Research Center, Tehran, 1997775555, Iran.
S MirzaeiDepartment of Nanotechnology and Tissue Engineering, Stem Cell Technology Research Center, Tehran, 1997775555, Iran.
M Soufi ZomorrodDepartment of Hematology, Faculty of Medical Science, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, 14115-111, Iran.
L LangroudiDepartment of Medical Immunology, Faculty of Medical Science, Tatbiat Modares University, Tehran, 14115-111, Iran.
A DoostmohammadiMaterials Department, Engineering Faculty, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, 8818634139, Iran.
E SeyedjafariDepartment of Biotechnology, College of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, 14155-6455, Iran.
M SoleimaniDepartment of Hematology, Faculty of Medical Science, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, 14115-111, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThere is growing need for new scaffold constructions for synthetic bone graft substitutes to repair large bone lesions. A very promising and important class of new implants for tissue engineering is based on three-dimensional scaffolds and bioceramics. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this study, after investigation of mechanical properties of polyethersulphone (PES) nanofibres, fabricated by electrospinning methodology and coated with bioactive glass (BG), cells of the MG-63 line were cultured on surfaces of these scaffolds. Their capacity to support MG-63 proliferation was also investigated in vitro by MTT assay. Osteoconductivity on these scaffolds was investigated by the common osteogenic markers alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, calcium mineral deposition and bone-related gene activation. Next, a bone reconstruction of rat critical-size defects model was evaluated using radiographic imaging analysis (digital mammography), computed tomography and histological examination.

resultsIn vitro results indicated that biocompatibility and osteogenic markers of MG-63 cells were significantly enhanced after coating PES with BG. Based on in vivo results, new bone formation in the defect site was enhanced in implanted rats in comparison with a control group. The highest reconstruction was observed in animals implanted with BG-coated nanofibres.

conclusionsOsteoconductivity of PES nanofibres was markedly enhanced after coating them with BG, and introduction of this construct as new bone-graft substitute for bone loss and defects is indicated.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone RegenerationBone SubstitutesCell LineCell ProliferationCeramicsMaleNanofibersOsteogenesisPolymersRatsSkullSulfonesTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBioglassBone Substitutespolyether sulfonePolymersSulfones

Identifiers

PMID26121911
PMCPMC6496773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.