Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26121607›Full record

ArticleAging cell2015

Age-dependent decline in fin regenerative capacity in the short-lived fish Nothobranchius furzeri.

Sebastian Wendler, Nils Hartmann, Beate Hoppe, Christoph Englert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging cell, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Killiverse: an interactive multi-omics web resource for killifish.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Regeneration in fish, with special focus on killifishes.Fish physiology and biochemistry · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Skeletal Muscle Aging: Lessons From Teleosts.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sebastian WendlerMolecular Genetics Laboratory, Leibniz Institute for Age Research - Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI), Beutenbergstr. 11, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Nils HartmannMolecular Genetics Laboratory, Leibniz Institute for Age Research - Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI), Beutenbergstr. 11, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Beate HoppeMolecular Genetics Laboratory, Leibniz Institute for Age Research - Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI), Beutenbergstr. 11, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Christoph EnglertMolecular Genetics Laboratory, Leibniz Institute for Age Research - Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI), Beutenbergstr. 11, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Leibniz Institute on Aging - Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential to regenerate declines with age in a wide range of organisms. A popular model system to study the mechanisms of regeneration is the fin of teleost fish, which has the ability to fully regrow upon amputation. Here, we used the short-lived killifish Nothobranchius furzeri to analyse the impact of aging on fin regeneration in more detail. We observed that young fish were able to nearly completely (98%) regenerate their amputated caudal fins within 4 weeks, whereas middle-aged fish reached 78%, old fish 57% and very old fish 46% of their original fin size. The difference in growth rate between young and old fish was already significant at 3 days post amputation (dpa) and increased with time. We therefore hypothesized that early events are crucial for the age-related differences in regenerative capacity. Indeed, we could observe a higher percentage of proliferating cells in early regenerating fin tissue of young fish compared with aged fish and larger fractions of apoptotic cells in aged fish. Furthermore, young fish showed peak upregulation of several genes involved in fgf and wnt/β-catenin signalling at an earlier time point than old fish. Our findings suggest that regenerative processes are initiated earlier and that regeneration overall is more efficient in younger fish.

Indexed as

AgingAnimal FinsAnimalsApoptosisCell ProliferationFishesRegenerationagingcaudal finepimorphic regenerationshort lifespanteleost killifish

Identifiers

PMID26121607
PMCPMC4568973
OpenAlexW1921187749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.