Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26121576›Full record

ArticleAutophagy2015

Comment on: HMGB1-dependent and -independent autophagy.

Peter Huebener, Geum Youn Gwak, Robert F Schwabe

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Autophagy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Peter Huebenera I. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf ; Hamburg , Germany.
Geum Youn Gwak
Robert F Schwabe
Columbia University · USSamsung Medical Center · KRUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HMGB1 (high mobility group box 1), a ubiquitously expressed DNA-binding nucleoprotein, has not only been attributed with important functions in the regulation of gene expression but is thought to function as an important damage-associated molecular pattern in the extracellular space. Recently, conditional Hmgb1 deletion strategies have been employed to overcome the perinatal mortality of global Hmgb1 deletion and to understand HMGB1 functions under disease conditions. From these studies, it has become evident that HMGB1 is not required for normal organ function. However, the different conditional ablation strategies have yielded contradictory results in some disease models. With nearly complete recombination in all transgenic mouse models, the main reason for opposite results is likely to lie within different targeting strategies. In summary, different targeting strategies need to be taken into account when interpreting HMGB1 functions, and further efforts need to be undertaken to compare these models side by side.

Indexed as

AutophagyAnimalsHMGB1 ProteinHumansHMGB1 Protein

Identifiers

PMID26121576
PMCPMC4590679
OpenAlexW1840845496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.