Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26121368›Full record

ReviewThe European journal of neuroscience2016

Strategies to promote peripheral nerve regeneration: electrical stimulation and/or exercise.

Tessa Gordon, Arthur W English

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The European journal of neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03698136 (Electrical Stimulation in Denervated Muscles of the Upper Limbs - Effect on Muscle Morphological Properties - a Pilot Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 141 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
141citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03698136 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Electrical Stimulation in Denervated Muscles of the Upper Limbs - Effect on Muscle Morphological Properties - a Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSwiss Paraplegic Research, NottwilRan2018 to 2020Enrolled20ConditionsTetraplegiaArmsStimulation of denervated muscles
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

141 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 304 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. [Effectiveness of TZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Exercise-Induced Differential Transcriptional Output of AMPK Signaling Improves Axon Regeneration and Functional Recovery.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Peripheral nerve repair: innovations and future directions.Journal of translational medicine · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Implantable Self-Powered Systems for Electrical Stimulation Medical Devices.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

81 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tessa GordonDivision of Plastic Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, 06.9706 Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, M4G 1X8, Canada.
Arthur W EnglishDepartment of Cell Biology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Emory University · USHospital for Sick Children · CA

Funding

SPINAL CIRCUITS &THE MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEMP01HD032571 · NICHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI NICHOLS, T. RICHARD · 1995 to 2016
$16.2M
Exercise, neurotrophins, and axon regeneration in the PNSR01NS057190 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI ENGLISH, ARTHUR W. · 2007 to 2016
$3.3M
Canadian Institutes of Health ResearchNICHD NIH HHS P01 HD032571NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS057190
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhancing the regeneration of axons is often considered to be a therapeutic target for improving functional recovery after peripheral nerve injury. In this review, the evidence for the efficacy of electrical stimulation (ES), daily exercise and their combination in promoting nerve regeneration after peripheral nerve injuries in both animal models and in human patients is explored. The rationale, effectiveness and molecular basis of ES and exercise in accelerating axon outgrowth are reviewed. In comparing the effects of ES and exercise in enhancing axon regeneration, increased neural activity, neurotrophins and androgens are considered to be common requirements. Similarly, there are sex-specific requirements for exercise to enhance axon regeneration in the periphery and for sustaining synaptic inputs onto injured motoneurons. ES promotes nerve regeneration after delayed nerve repair in humans and rats. The effectiveness of exercise is less clear. Although ES, but not exercise, results in a significant misdirection of regenerating motor axons to reinnervate different muscle targets, the loss of neuromuscular specificity encountered has only a very small impact on resulting functional recovery. Both ES and exercise are promising experimental treatments for peripheral nerve injury that seem to be ready to be translated to clinical use.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyExercise TherapyNerve RegenerationAnimalsHumansMuscle, SkeletalPeripheral Nerve Injurieselectrical stimulationexercise and nerve regenerationexercise or electrical stimulationnerve stimulationperipheral nerve regeneration

Identifiers

PMID26121368
PMCPMC4695319
OpenAlexW1556826327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.