Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26121365›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

A Biofilm Pocket Model to Evaluate Different Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment Modalities in Terms of Biofilm Removal and Reformation, Surface Alterations and Attachment of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts.

Tobias T Hägi, Sabrina Klemensberger, Riccarda Bereiter, Sandor Nietzsche, Raluca Cosgarea, Simon Flury, Adrian Lussi, Anton Sculean, Sigrun Eick

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04493398 nacompletednot on this map

Erythritol Air-polishing Versus Curette/Ultrasonic Debridement of Mandibular Furcation Lesions in Supportive Periodontal Therapy A 12-Month Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BergenRan2015 to 2018Enrolled20ConditionsPeriodontitis, Adult PeriodontitisArmsGracey curette., Ultrasonic scaler., Erythritol air-polishing.
NCT05799261 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Protocol (Guided Biofilm Management) for Supportive Periodontal Therapy: a Long-term Randomized Controlled Clinical Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BernRan2022 to 2025Enrolled50ConditionsPeriodontitisArmsControl (standard protocol), Test (Guided Biofilm management)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Tobias T HägiDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Sabrina KlemensbergerDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Riccarda BereiterDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Sandor NietzscheCentre of Electron Microscopy, University Hospital of Jena, Jena, Germany.
Raluca CosgareaDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania; Department of Periodontology, Philips University, Marburg, Germany.
Simon FluryDepartment of Preventive, Restorative and Pediatric Dentistry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Adrian LussiDepartment of Preventive, Restorative and Pediatric Dentistry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Anton SculeanDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Sigrun EickDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
University of Bern · CHJena University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimThere is a lack of suitable in vitro models to evaluate various treatment modalities intending to remove subgingival bacterial biofilm. Consequently, the aims of this in vitro-study were: a) to establish a pocket model enabling mechanical removal of biofilm and b) to evaluate repeated non-surgical periodontal treatment with respect to biofilm removal and reformation, surface alterations, tooth hard-substance-loss, and attachment of periodontal ligament (PDL) fibroblasts. MATERIAL AND

methodsStandardized human dentin specimens were colonized by multi-species biofilms for 3.5 days and subsequently placed into artificially created pockets. Non-surgical periodontal treatment was performed as follows: a) hand-instrumentation with curettes (CUR), b) ultrasonication (US), c) subgingival air-polishing using erythritol (EAP) and d) subgingival air-polishing using erythritol combined with chlorhexidine digluconate (EAP-CHX). The reduction and recolonization of bacterial counts, surface roughness (Ra and Rz), the caused tooth substance-loss (thickness) as well as the attachment of PDL fibroblasts were evaluated and statistically analyzed by means of ANOVA with Post-Hoc LSD.

resultsAfter 5 treatments, bacterial reduction in biofilms was highest when applying EAP-CHX (4 log10). The lowest reduction was found after CUR (2 log10). Additionally, substance-loss was the highest when using CUR (128±40 µm) in comparison with US (14±12 µm), EAP (6±7 µm) and EAP-CHX (11±10) µm). Surface was roughened when using CUR and US. Surfaces exposed to US and to EAP attracted the highest numbers of PDL fibroblasts.

conclusionThe established biofilm model simulating a periodontal pocket combined with interchangeable placements of test specimens with multi-species biofilms enables the evaluation of different non-surgical treatment modalities on biofilm removal and surface alterations. Compared to hand instrumentation the application of ultrasonication and of air-polishing with erythritol prevents from substance-loss and results in a smooth surface with nearly no residual biofilm that promotes the reattachment of PDL fibroblasts.

Indexed as

BiofilmsModels, BiologicalBacteriaCell AdhesionColony Count, MicrobialDentinFibroblastsHumansPeriodontal LigamentPeriodontal PocketSurface PropertiesTooth

Identifiers

PMID26121365
PMCPMC4486723
OpenAlexW1500324549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.