Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26121108›Full record

Trial reportBone marrow transplantation2015

Salvage bortezomib-dexamethasone and high-dose melphalan (HDM) and autologous stem cell support (ASCT) in myeloma patients at first relapse after HDM with ASCT. A phase-2 trial.

P Gimsing, Ø Hjertner, N Abildgaard, N F Andersen, T G Dahl, H Gregersen, T W Klausen, U-H Mellqvist, O Linder, R Lindås and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Bone marrow transplantation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The first relapse in multiple myeloma: how to pick the next best thing.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

P GimsingDepartment of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ø HjertnerDepartment of Hematology, St. Olavs University Hospital, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
N AbildgaardDepartment of Hematology, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
N F AndersenDepartment of Hematology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
T G DahlDepartment of Hematology, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
H GregersenDepartment of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark.
T W KlausenDepartment of Hematology, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
U-H MellqvistDepartment of Hematology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenborg, Sweden.
O LinderDepartment of Hematology, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.
R LindåsDepartment of Hematology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
N Tøffner ClausenDepartment of Hematology, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
S LenhoffDepartment of Hematology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Haukeland University Hospital · NOSahlgrenska University Hospital · SEUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKAalborg University · DKAalborg University Hospital · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKHerlev Hospital · DKSkåne University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Until recently, only retrospective studies had been published on salvage high-dose melphalan (HDM) with autologous stem cell 'transplantation' (ASCT). In a prospective, nonrandomized phase-2 study, we treated 53 bortezomib-naïve patients with bortezomib-dexamethasone as induction and bortezomib included in the conditioning regimen along with the HDM. Median progression-free survival (PFS), time to next treatment (TNT) and overall survival (OS) after start of reinduction therapy were 21.6, 22.8 and 46.6 months, respectively. For 49 patients who completed salvage bortezomib-HDM(II) with ASCT, there was no significant difference of PFS and TNT after HDM (II) compared with after the initial HDM(I), and thus patients were their own controls (PFS (I: 20.1 vs II: 19.3 months (P=0.8)) or TNT (I: 24.4 vs II: 20.7 months (P=0.8)). No significant differences in the response rates after salvage ASCT compared with the initial ASCT. Bortezomib-HDM conditioning combo was feasible, and toxicity was as expected for patients treated with bortezomib and ASCT. In conclusion, in bortezomib-naïve patients treated at first relapse with salvage ASCT including bortezomib, PSF and TNT did not differ significantly from initial ASCT and median OS was almost 5.5 years with acceptable toxicity. A recent prospective randomized study confirms salvage ASCT to be an effective treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBortezomibDexamethasoneFemaleHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansMaleMelphalanMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRecurrenceTransplantation, AutologousTransplantation ConditioningBortezomibDexamethasoneMelphalan

Identifiers

PMID26121108
PMCPMC4598614
OpenAlexW1909023382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.