Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26121073›Full record

SynthesisCritical care medicine2015

The Impact of Timing of Antibiotics on Outcomes in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Sarah A Sterling, W Ryan Miller, Jason Pryor, Michael A Puskarich, Alan E Jones

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 174 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
174citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
27.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

174 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 429 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Association of time to antibiotics and clinical outcomes in patients with fever and neutropenia during chemotherapy for cancer: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Impact of Prehospital Care on Outcomes in Sepsis: A Systematic Review.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2016
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Extracorporeal Cytokine Hemadsorption with oXirisJournal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Time to Initiation of Antibiotic Therapy in Critically Ill Patients with Suspected Sepsis and Its Effect on Intensive Care Unit Mortality: Analysis Using Bayesian Approach.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article

114 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah A SterlingAll authors: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Mississippi School of Medicine, Jackson, MS.
W Ryan Miller
Jason Pryor
Michael A Puskarich
Alan E Jones
University of Mississippi Medical Center · US

Funding

L-carnitine Treatment for Vasopressor Dependent Septic ShockR01GM103799 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MED CTR · PI JONES, ALAN E · 2012 to 2016
$3.1M
Platelet activation in septic shockK23GM113041 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MED CTR · PI PUSKARICH, MICHAEL A. · 2015 to 2018
$763k
NIGMS NIH HHS K23 GM113041NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM103799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe sought to systematically review and meta-analyze the available data on the association between timing of antibiotic administration and mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive search criteria was performed using a predefined protocol. STUDY SELECTION: INCLUSION CRITERIA: adult patients with severe sepsis or septic shock, reported time to antibiotic administration in relation to emergency department triage and/or shock recognition, and mortality. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: immunosuppressed populations, review article, editorial, or nonhuman studies. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers screened abstracts with a third reviewer arbitrating. The effect of time to antibiotic administration on mortality was based on current guideline recommendations: 1) administration within 3 hours of emergency department triage and 2) administration within 1 hour of severe sepsis/septic shock recognition. Odds ratios were calculated using a random effect model. The primary outcome was mortality. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 1,123 publications were identified and 11 were included in the analysis. Among the 11 included studies, 16,178 patients were evaluable for antibiotic administration from emergency department triage. Patients who received antibiotics more than 3 hours after emergency department triage (< 3 hr reference) had a pooled odds ratio for mortality of 1.16 (0.92-1.46; p = 0.21). A total of 11,017 patients were evaluable for antibiotic administration from severe sepsis/septic shock recognition. Patients who received antibiotics more than 1 hour after severe sepsis/shock recognition (< 1 hr reference) had a pooled odds ratio for mortality of 1.46 (0.89-2.40; p = 0.13). There was no increased mortality in the pooled odds ratios for each hourly delay from less than 1 to more than 5 hours in antibiotic administration from severe sepsis/shock recognition.

conclusionUsing the available pooled data, we found no significant mortality benefit of administering antibiotics within 3 hours of emergency department triage or within 1 hour of shock recognition in severe sepsis and septic shock. These results suggest that currently recommended timing metrics as measures of quality of care are not supported by the available evidence.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsEmergency Service, HospitalHospital MortalityHumansLength of StaySepsisShock, SepticTriageAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID26121073
PMCPMC4597314
OpenAlexW854296307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.