Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26120964›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2015

The medial entorhinal cortex is necessary for temporal organization of hippocampal neuronal activity.

Magdalene I Schlesiger, Christopher C Cannova, Brittney L Boublil, Jena B Hales, Emily A Mankin, Mark P Brandon, Jill K Leutgeb, Christian Leibold, Stefan Leutgeb

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 106 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 187 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The hippocampus as a generative model.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Magdalene I Schlesiger1] Neurobiology Section and Center for Neural Circuits and Behavior, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA. [2] Graduate School of Systemic Neurosciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Planegg, Germany.
Christopher C CannovaNeurobiology Section and Center for Neural Circuits and Behavior, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Brittney L BoublilNeurobiology Section and Center for Neural Circuits and Behavior, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Jena B HalesDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Emily A MankinNeurobiology Section and Center for Neural Circuits and Behavior, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Mark P BrandonNeurobiology Section and Center for Neural Circuits and Behavior, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Jill K LeutgebNeurobiology Section and Center for Neural Circuits and Behavior, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Christian LeiboldDepartment Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Planegg, Germany.
Stefan Leutgeb1] Neurobiology Section and Center for Neural Circuits and Behavior, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA. [2] Kavli Institute for Brain and Mind, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
University of California, San Diego · USLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

Neurosciences Graduate Training ProgramT32NS061847 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Brenda L Bloodgood · 2008 to 2026
$7.7M
Memory processing after neuron loss in the entorhinal cortex and hippocampusR01NS086947 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LEUTGEB, STEFAN · 2014 to 2024
$3.9M
Temporally precise control of theta oscillationsR21MH100354 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LEUTGEB, STEFAN · 2013 to 2014
$404k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH100354NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS086947NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS061847
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The superficial layers of the medial entorhinal cortex (MEC) are a major input to the hippocampus. The high proportion of spatially modulated cells, including grid cells and border cells, in these layers suggests that MEC inputs are critical for the representation of space in the hippocampus. However, selective manipulations of the MEC do not completely abolish hippocampal spatial firing. To determine whether other hippocampal firing characteristics depend more critically on MEC inputs, we recorded from hippocampal CA1 cells in rats with MEC lesions. Theta phase precession was substantially disrupted, even during periods of stable spatial firing. Our findings indicate that MEC inputs to the hippocampus are required for the temporal organization of hippocampal firing patterns and suggest that cognitive functions that depend on precise neuronal sequences in the hippocampal theta cycle are particularly dependent on the MEC.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalCA1 Region, HippocampalEntorhinal CortexMaleNeural PathwaysNeuronsPatch-Clamp TechniquesRatsRats, Long-EvansSpace PerceptionTheta Rhythm

Identifiers

PMID26120964
PMCPMC4711275
OpenAlexW2138730144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.