ArticleMicrobiome2015
16S rRNA gene-based profiling of the human infant gut microbiota is strongly influenced by sample processing and PCR primer choice.
Article in Microbiome, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 153 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
153 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of Maternal Nutritional Supplementation during Pregnancy and Lactation on the Infant Gut or Breastmilk Microbiota: A Systematic Review.Nutrients · 2021Pooled it
- Effects ofCell reports. Medicine · 2021Trial
- Effect of Saccharomyces boulardii and Mode of Delivery on the Early Development of the Gut Microbial Community in Preterm Infants.PloS one · 2016Trial
- An ode to the 16S rRNA gene: its history, importance, caveats and future in microbiome research.Microbial genomics · 2026Review
- Metagenomic Insights Into Red Sea Biodiversity Across the Web of Life.Environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of MinION and MiSeq using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing in human gut microbiome.BMC biotechnology · 2026Article
- Advanced Dental Composite Technology via Bisilanized Dual-Action Nanofillers for Biofilm Control.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- CUPID-seq enables highly multiplexed amplicon sequencing via combinatorial in-line dual indexing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Identification of gut microbiota features of diarrheic calves using the full-length 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and machine learning.Animal microbiome · 2026Article
- Transplantation-Driven Microbial Shifts and Keystone Taxa Enhance Medicinal Ingredients inMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Toward reproducible pig gut microbiome profiling through standardized methodologies.ISME communications · 2026Article
- Seasonal dynamics of the gut microbiota inFrontiers in insect science · 2026Article
- Significant strain microdiversity in mother-infant dyad cohorts across ethnic groups reveals population specificity of bifidobacteria microbiota transmission.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Amoxicillin and metronidazole resistance of bacteria isolated from dental implants with peri-implant diseases: a pilot cross-sectional study.Access microbiology · 2026Article
- NaMeco - Nanopore full-length 16S rRNA gene reads clustering and annotation.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Amino acid competition shapes Acinetobacter baumannii gut carriage.Cell host & microbe · 2025Article
- Why Are Long-Read Sequencing Methods Revolutionizing Microbiome Analysis?Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Do we need a standardized 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing analysis protocol for poultry microbiota research?Poultry science · 2025Review
- Impact of DNA Extraction and 16S rRNA Gene Amplification Strategy on Microbiota Profiling of Faecal Samples.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Refining microbiome diversity analysis by concatenating and integrating dual 16S rRNA amplicon reads.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2025Article
93 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCharacterisation of the bacterial composition of the gut microbiota is increasingly carried out with a view to establish the role of different bacterial species in causation or prevention of disease. It is thus essential that the methods used to determine the microbial composition are robust. Here, several widely used molecular techniques were compared to establish the optimal methods to assess the bacterial composition in faecal samples from babies, before weaning.
resultsThe bacterial community profile detected in the faeces of infants is highly dependent on the methodology used. Bifidobacteria were the most abundant bacteria detected at 6 weeks in faeces from two initially breast-fed babies using fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH), in agreement with data from previous culture-based studies. Using the 16S rRNA gene sequencing approach, however, we found that the detection of bifidobacteria in particular crucially depended on the optimisation of the DNA extraction method, and the choice of primers used to amplify the V1-V3 regions of 16S rRNA genes prior to subsequent sequence analysis. Bifidobacteria were only well represented among amplified 16S rRNA gene sequences when mechanical disruption (bead-beating) procedures for DNA extraction were employed together with optimised "universal" PCR primers. These primers incorporate degenerate bases at positions where mismatches to bifidobacteria and other bacterial taxa occur. The use of a DNA extraction kit with no bead-beating step resulted in a complete absence of bifidobacteria in the sequence data, even when using the optimised primers.
conclusionsThis work emphasises the importance of sample processing methodology to downstream sequencing results and illustrates the value of employing multiple approaches for determining microbiota composition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.