Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26120373›Full record

ArticleJudgment and decision making2015

Risks deter but pleasures allure: Is pleasure more important?

Li-Wei Chao, Helena Szrek, Rui Leite, Karl Peltzer, Shandir Ramlagan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Judgment and decision making, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Li-Wei ChaoPopulation Studies Center, University of Pennsylvania, 3718 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6298, U.S.A. ; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania. ; Porto Business School, University of Porto. ; HIV/AIDS, STIs and TB Research Programme, Human Sciences Research Council. ; Centre for Economics and Finance, University of Porto.
Helena SzrekPorto Business School, University of Porto. ; Centre for Economics and Finance, University of Porto.
Rui LeiteCentre for Economics and Finance, University of Porto. ; Faculty of Economics, University of Porto.
Karl PeltzerHIV/AIDS, STIs and TB Research Programme, Human Sciences Research Council. ; Department of Psychology, University of Limpopo. ; ASEAN Institute for Health Development, Mahidol University.
Shandir RamlaganHIV/AIDS, STIs and TB Research Programme, Human Sciences Research Council.

Funding

STATISTICAL DATA ENCLAVE COREP30AG012836 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI COE, NORMA B, KOHLER, HANS-PETER · 1999 to 2024
$14.0M
Population Science Research Center Development CoreR24HD044964 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SMITH, HERBERT L. · 2003 to 2017
$9.8M
Sci-Tech Core-Population Dynamics Research CenterP2CHD044964 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI EMILIO ALBERTO PARRADO · 2018 to 2026
$5.3M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG012836NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD044964NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD044964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pursuit of unhealthy behaviors, such as smoking or binge drinking, not only carries various downside risks, but also provides pleasure. A parsimonious model, used in the literature to explain the decision to pursue an unhealthy activity, represents that decision as a tradeoff between risks and benefits. We build on this literature by surveying a rural population in South Africa to elicit the perceived riskiness and the perceived pleasure for various risky activities and to examine how these perceptions relate to the pursuit of four specific unhealthy behaviors: frequent smoking, problem drinking, seatbelt nonuse, and risky sex. We show that perceived pleasure is a significant predictor for three of the behaviors and that perceived riskiness is a significant predictor for two of them. We also show that the correlation between the riskiness rating and behavior is significantly different from the correlation between the pleasure rating and behavior for three of the four behaviors. Finally, we show that the effect of pleasure is significantly greater than the effect of riskiness in determining drinking and risky sex, while the effects of pleasure and riskiness are not different from each other in determining smoking and seatbelt nonuse. We discuss how our findings can be used to inform the design of health promotion strategies.

Indexed as

drinkinghealth behaviorhealth promotionperceived benefitperceived riskrisky behaviorseatbelt usesexual behaviorsmoking

Identifiers

PMID26120373
PMCPMC4479211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.