Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26120246›Full record

ArticleInvertebrate reproduction & development2015

Szymon Tomczyk, Kathleen Fischer, Steven Austad, Brigitte Galliot

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Invertebrate reproduction & development, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. FromCells · 2026
    Review
  6. Telomerase expression and activity in the immortal cnidarian Hydra.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. IsJournal of developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  9. Genome research · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Nontraditional systems in aging research: an update.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  19. The Evolution of the Hallmarks of Aging.Frontiers in genetics · 2021
    Review
  20. Alternative Animal Models of Aging Research.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Szymon TomczykFaculty of Sciences, Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva , Geneva , Switzerland.
Kathleen FischerDepartment of Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham UAB , Birmingham , AL , USA.
Steven AustadDepartment of Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham UAB , Birmingham , AL , USA.
Brigitte GalliotFaculty of Sciences, Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva , Geneva , Switzerland.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

Hydra: New Models for Aging ResearchR01AG037962 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI AUSTAD, STEVEN N. · 2010 to 2014
$1.2M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG037962
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cnidarian

Indexed as

Cold-sensitive strainHydra oligactisinducible agingloss of somatic stem cellsneurodegenerationsexual differentiation

Identifiers

PMID26120246
PMCPMC4463768
OpenAlexW2020113740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.