Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26120240›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetism and magnetic materials2015

QUANTIFYING THE MOTION OF MAGNETIC PARTICLES IN EXCISED TISSUE: EFFECT OF PARTICLE PROPERTIES AND APPLIED MAGNETIC FIELD.

Sandip Kulkarni, Bharath Ramaswamy, Emily Horton, Sruthi Gangapuram, Alek Nacev, Didier Depireux, Mika Shimoji, Benjamin Shapiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetism and magnetic materials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Magnetic Composite Biomaterials for Neural Regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Nanomagnetic-mediated drug delivery for the treatment of dental disease.Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sandip KulkarniFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland at College Park, MD 20742, United States.
Bharath RamaswamyFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland at College Park, MD 20742, United States.
Emily HortonFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland at College Park, MD 20742, United States.
Sruthi GangapuramFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland at College Park, MD 20742, United States.
Alek NacevWeinberg Medical Physics, LLC.
Didier DepireuxThe Institute for Systems Research, University of Maryland at College Park, MD 20742, United States ; Otomagnetics, LLC.
Mika ShimojiFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland at College Park, MD 20742, United States ; Otomagnetics, LLC.
Benjamin ShapiroFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland at College Park, MD 20742, United States ; The Institute for Systems Research, University of Maryland at College Park, MD 20742, United States ; Otomagnetics, LLC.
University of Maryland, College Park · USWeinberg Medical Physics (United States) · US

Funding

Focusing of Drug-Coated Nano-Particles to Deep Tissue Tumors by Feedback ControlR21EB009265 · NIBIB · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI LUEBBE, ANDREAS S., SHAPIRO, BENJAMIN · 2009 to 2010
$370k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB009265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article presents a method to investigate how magnetic particle characteristics affect their motion inside tissues under the influence of an applied magnetic field. Particles are placed on top of freshly excised tissue samples, a calibrated magnetic field is applied by a magnet underneath each tissue sample, and we image and quantify particle penetration depth by quantitative metrics to assess how particle sizes, their surface coatings, and tissue resistance affect particle motion. Using this method, we tested available fluorescent particles from Chemicell of four sizes (100 nm, 300 nm, 500 nm, and 1 µm diameter) with four different coatings (starch, chitosan, lipid, PEG/P) and quantified their motion through freshly excised rat liver, kidney, and brain tissues. In broad terms, we found that the applied magnetic field moved chitosan particles most effectively through all three tissue types (as compared to starch, lipid, and PEG/P coated particles). However, the relationship between particle properties and their resulting motion was found to be complex. Hence, it will likely require substantial further study to elucidate the nuances of transport mechanisms and to select and engineer optimal particle properties to enable the most effective transport through various tissue types under applied magnetic fields.

Identifiers

PMID26120240
PMCPMC4477713
OpenAlexW428571530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.