ArticleJournal of magnetism and magnetic materials2015
QUANTIFYING THE MOTION OF MAGNETIC PARTICLES IN EXCISED TISSUE: EFFECT OF PARTICLE PROPERTIES AND APPLIED MAGNETIC FIELD.
Article in Journal of magnetism and magnetic materials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Magnetophoretic transport of functionalised iron-oxide nanoparticles through biomimetic hydrogels and extracellular matrix.Nanoscale advances · 2026Article
- Magnetic Composite Biomaterials for Neural Regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Review
- Magnetically assisted intraperitoneal drug delivery for cancer chemotherapy.Drug delivery · 2018Article
- Novel magnetic nanoparticle-containing adhesive with greater dentin bond strength and antibacterial and remineralizing capabilities.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2018Article
- Nanomagnetic-mediated drug delivery for the treatment of dental disease.Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine · 2018Article
- Focusing light inside scattering media with magnetic-particle-guided wavefront shaping.Optica · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This article presents a method to investigate how magnetic particle characteristics affect their motion inside tissues under the influence of an applied magnetic field. Particles are placed on top of freshly excised tissue samples, a calibrated magnetic field is applied by a magnet underneath each tissue sample, and we image and quantify particle penetration depth by quantitative metrics to assess how particle sizes, their surface coatings, and tissue resistance affect particle motion. Using this method, we tested available fluorescent particles from Chemicell of four sizes (100 nm, 300 nm, 500 nm, and 1 µm diameter) with four different coatings (starch, chitosan, lipid, PEG/P) and quantified their motion through freshly excised rat liver, kidney, and brain tissues. In broad terms, we found that the applied magnetic field moved chitosan particles most effectively through all three tissue types (as compared to starch, lipid, and PEG/P coated particles). However, the relationship between particle properties and their resulting motion was found to be complex. Hence, it will likely require substantial further study to elucidate the nuances of transport mechanisms and to select and engineer optimal particle properties to enable the most effective transport through various tissue types under applied magnetic fields.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.